Tyler, Nabeel, and Jackson on French thinkers


Nabeel: (57:47) …For example, there’s a French thinker called Jacques Derrida. I probably should go and read him at some point, but I’m not entirely convinced there is a there there, and I don’t know anyone who swears by it. If Tyler told me, “Nabeel, you are missing a big piece of your life by not reading him,” I would go read him tomorrow. But I don’t have any of those people.

Tyler: (58:44) Lacan is my marginal case of “no there there.” So Derrida, I put in a fair amount of effort and did conclude, rightly or wrongly, that there’s no there there. So you can, in my opinion, write him off. Lacan, I keep on wondering. Smart people still will say, “This is amazing.” I’ve tried a bunch of times, but I haven’t given up. There’s a new Lacan book coming out later this summer and I’ll try it again. We’ll see. That’s my marginal “is there a there there” figure.

Nabeel: (59:13) Yeah. I think modern French thinkers put too much of a premium on sounding cool, or postmodern philosophy generally. I think it repays some effort to kind of grasp the core ideas, but it doesn’t repay making it your life’s reading or something.

Tyler: (59:26) Baudrillard is quite good and Foucault is extremely interesting. So I’m not against “the French” in this period, but if they keep on not making sense, I feel I’m educated well enough.

Jackson: (59:37) You have a lot of context.

Tyler: (59:38) That at some point I can strike the ledger.

Nabeel: (59:41) I do—Nowadays, I just put Foucault through GPT and I just have GPT explain it to me, and that’s going to be good enough for now.

Tyler: (59:50) The problem with Foucault, I think, is so much of the history is wrong in a quite mundane way, so there’s something very problematic about it. But the stuff—I think it’s in a way quite simple, almost too simple. And the fact that the current right has so latched on to Foucault is a sign that it’s simple. I don’t mean necessarily bad, but there are these structures and they’re trying to tell you what to do. And there’s something anonymous about that as well. It’s not just the individuals who form the conspiracy. It’s how a lot of the world thinks today.

Here is the longer discussion, already linked to.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Ottawa to announce details of retaliatory tariffs on U.S. Tuesday

    OTTAWA — The federal government is set to unveil details of Canada’s retaliatory tariffs against the United States on Tuesday. OTTAWA — The federal government is set to unveil details…

    Hamilton steelworkers union, business leaders warn of harder times ahead as Ford promises tariff relief

    As U.S. President Donald Trump threatens new 50 per cent tariffs on various Canadian products, the head of a Hamilton steelworkers union says the situation is “concerning” for those in…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Canadian leaders won’t rule out using energy, critical minerals as retaliation against U.S.

    Canadian leaders won’t rule out using energy, critical minerals as retaliation against U.S.

    Newegg Has the Least Overpriced 32GB of DDR-6000MHz CL 30 Desktop Memory

    Newegg Has the Least Overpriced 32GB of DDR-6000MHz CL 30 Desktop Memory

    Data centers become “killer application” for new power transformer tech

    Data centers become “killer application” for new power transformer tech

    Canada Breakdown Spurs Alarm, Consternation Over Future of Trade Between North American Neighbors

    Canada Breakdown Spurs Alarm, Consternation Over Future of Trade Between North American Neighbors

    Ottawa to announce details of retaliatory tariffs on U.S. Tuesday

    Ottawa to announce details of retaliatory tariffs on U.S. Tuesday

    NASA’s New Space Telescope Is Poised to Discover Hidden Facets of the Universe

    NASA’s New Space Telescope Is Poised to Discover Hidden Facets of the Universe