When supply shocks make inflation harder to control


Although demand forces contributed to this rise, supply-side factors drove the largest share of the increase. For example, the surge in inflation of goods prices largely reflected shipping bottlenecks, shortages of key inputs and higher energy prices. And for services, it partly reflected labour shortages and capacity constraints that added supply pressures.

Supply-side challenges later eased, helping bring inflation back toward the midpoint of the Bank of Canada’s 1%–3% control range.

Over the coming years, supply shocks could continue to be more frequent and larger than before the pandemic because of climate-related disruptions, geopolitical tensions and the reshaping of global trade networks. These forces could put renewed pressure on energy costs and supply chains, making supply-side factors a more frequent source of inflationary pressures.

Large supply shocks increase the likelihood of high inflation and a recession

To better understand how more frequent and larger supply shocks could affect the economy, we turn to the Bank’s Terms-of-Trade Economic Model.

Starting with a stable economy in the model, we generate thousands of possible economic paths by repeatedly exposing the model to supply and demand shocks consistent with historical patterns. The model then traces how inflation, output and interest rates evolve over time.

We run three sets of simulations, each representing a different supply-shock environment. The supply shocks differ only in size and frequency—the persistence is held constant. Each simulation is calibrated using supply shocks estimated from different periods of Canadian economic history:

  • the normal case uses supply shocks from 1995 to 2019
  • the moderate case uses supply shocks from 2022 to mid-2025
  • the large case uses supply shocks from 2020 to mid-2025, which include the exceptional disruptions during the pandemic

The results show that moderate supply shocks make episodes of high inflation more frequent than in the normal case, but they do not significantly lengthen those episodes or greatly increase the risk of a recession (Table 1).

The picture changes when supply shocks are large. High inflation sticks around for about two quarters longer than it does in the normal case. The risk of a recession also rises, but the length of a recession changes little because our simulations increase the size of a shock and not its persistence.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Consumer sentiment falls as rising gas prices weigh on wallets, inflation expectations tick up

    Consumers report feeling more dour about the US economy as rising gas prices and trade tensions weigh on personal finances and business outlooks, according to a new survey from the…

    Continue reading
    Friday assorted links

    1. Some Princeton philosophers are converting to Catholicism. 2. New Ada Palmer podcast. 3. Nice statement of how intelligence is overrated in the AI debates. 4. Joshua Rothman on the…

    Continue reading

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Statement by Prime Minister Carney on Rosh Hashanah

    Statement by Prime Minister Carney on Rosh Hashanah

    Consumer sentiment falls as rising gas prices weigh on wallets, inflation expectations tick up

    Consumer sentiment falls as rising gas prices weigh on wallets, inflation expectations tick up

    ‘The Fix’ Interview: Liam Neeson and Zachary Levi

    ‘The Fix’ Interview: Liam Neeson and Zachary Levi

    PlayStation’s Shock Cancelation of Kojima’s New Game Now Makes Perfect Sense

    PlayStation’s Shock Cancelation of Kojima’s New Game Now Makes Perfect Sense

    Friday assorted links

    Friday assorted links

    Microsoft’s head of comms is leaving after almost 20 years

    Microsoft’s head of comms is leaving after almost 20 years