Music publishers sue Anthropic for $3 billion over ‘flagrant piracy’


A group of music publishers led by Concord Music Group and Universal Music Group Anthropic, . The suit accuses the AI company of illegally downloading more than 20,000 copyrighted songs, including sheet music, lyrics and compositions.

These songs were then allegedly fed into the chatbot Claude for training purposes. There are some iconic tunes named by Universal in the suit, including tracks by The Rolling Stones, Neil Diamond and Elton John, among many others. Concord is an independent publisher that handles artists like Common, Killer Mike and Korn.

The publishers issued a statement saying that the damages could amount to more than $3 billion. This would make it one of the largest non-class action copyright cases in US history.

“While Anthropic misleadingly claims to be an AI ‘safety and research’ company, its record of illegal torrenting of copyrighted works makes clear that its multibillion-dollar business empire has in fact been built on piracy,” the lawsuit says.

The suit was filed by the same legal team as . The music publishers say they found that Anthropic had been illegally downloading thousands of songs during the .

For the unfamiliar, the Bartz v. Anthropic case ended with an award of $1.5 billion to impacted writers after it was found that the company had illegally downloaded their published works for similar training purposes. The terms of that agreement dictated that the 500,000 authors involved in the case would get $3,000 per work. The $1.5 billion looks like a big number, but not so much when broken down like that. Also, Anthropic .

In the Bartz case, Judge William Alsup ruled that it was legal for Anthropic to train its models on copyrighted content but not legal to acquire that content via piracy. We’ll have to wait and see how this new suit shakes out. The legal precedent here seems to suggest that if Anthropic would have just spent a buck on each copyrighted song, then they’d be in the clear. That’s an odd distinction when it comes to building an entire company around snatching up copyrighted content, but whatever.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Waymo Is Trying to Crack Down on Solo Kids in Driverless Cars

    By law, autonomous vehicles aren’t allowed to carry unaccompanied minors in California. Waymo, Alphabet’s self-driving-car company, doesn’t allow kids under 18 to ride alone anywhere outside of metro Phoenix, Arizona.…

    Replit’s Amjad Masad on the Cursor deal, fighting Apple, and why he’d rather not sell

    Amjad Masad has been building Replit for a decade, but the last 18 months have been something else entirely. The AI coding assistant company went from $2.8 million in revenue…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Living Authentically: Key Lessons from ‘Just Who Will You Be?’ – Damon Ashworth Psychology

    Living Authentically: Key Lessons from ‘Just Who Will You Be?’ – Damon Ashworth Psychology

    Spirit Airlines could shut down without bailout

    Spirit Airlines could shut down without bailout

    Why 1,400+ Airline Orders Aren’t Enough To Get Boeing’s 737 MAX 10 Off The Ground In 2026

    Why 1,400+ Airline Orders Aren’t Enough To Get Boeing’s 737 MAX 10 Off The Ground In 2026

    Belgium in talks with Engie to nationalise nuclear assets

    Waymo Is Trying to Crack Down on Solo Kids in Driverless Cars

    Waymo Is Trying to Crack Down on Solo Kids in Driverless Cars

    Envoy exchange – iPolitics

    Envoy exchange – iPolitics