Meta reaches $16.7B US settlement over social media harms to children


Text to Speech Icon

Listen to this article

Estimated 4 minutes

The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.

Meta Platforms agreed to pay a maximum of $16.68 billion US as part of a settlement to resolve claims brought by states across the United States that the company designed Facebook and Instagram to get children addicted to them, misled consumers about their ‌safety and improperly collected the personal data of children who used its platforms, court papers show.

The settlement was reached during a California federal trial over claims brought by 29 states, averting one of the highest-profile tests yet of allegations that social media companies harmed young users.

Meta also agreed to make changes for teenage users of Facebook and Instagram countrywide as part of the settlement. The company will impose daily usage limits ​and restrict nighttime usage by children and ​enhance measures to prevent children from accessing age-restricted content. 

In agreeing to settle, the California-based company denied wrongdoing.

Wednesday’s settlement also resolves lawsuits by California, Illinois, New Mexico and Washington, D.C., over privacy claims related to the ​Cambridge Analytica scandal, where the consulting firm collected personal data of millions of Facebook users. 

Those states will ⁠receive $459.3 million US to resolve those lawsuits. 

The claims were part of a broader wave of litigation brought by states, local governments, school districts and individuals alleging Meta and other social media companies fuelled a countrywide youth mental health crisis.

The trial in the Oakland, California, federal court covered claims from California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey that Meta violated their state laws protecting consumers.

It also covered claims from 29 states ⁠that Meta violated the U.S. Children’s Online ⁠Privacy Protection Act by collecting personal data from users it knew were children ‌without parental notification or consent, and using the data to train machine learning and generative AI models.

The company had argued it could not have misled consumers about whether its services were addictive because social media addiction is not a recognized psychiatric condition.

six women standing in a line hold portraits of young people outside a court building
Parents hold pictures of their deceased children during a protest against social media platforms outside the Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse on Aug. 18 in Oakland, Calif. (Noah Berger/The Associated Press)

In a filing before the trial, Meta said California, Colorado, Kentucky and ⁠New Jersey were seeking up to $1.4 trillion US in penalties. The states suggested before the trial began that the figure would be closer to $200 billion US. The states were also seeking additional monetary damages, plus an order directing Meta to make major changes to its platforms and to bar children from creating accounts.

More cases pending

Meta, Snapchat ‌and its parent Snap, YouTube and its parent Alphabet, and TikTok and its parent ByteDance still face thousands of lawsuits in federal and state courts over claims they knowingly designed their platforms to have features that are addictive to children and teens, fuelling a mental health crisis.

The federal cases were consolidated before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, and include lawsuits brought by individuals, school districts and ​state governments.

Thousands more cases against the companies are pending in state courts. A judge in Los Angeles is overseeing thousands of lawsuits brought by individuals who say they or their loved ones were harmed by ⁠the platforms’ designs.

Around 30 states have filed lawsuits against the companies in state courts, court records show. A trial has been ongoing in Nashville since ⁠July over claims brought by the state against Meta.

WATCH | Meta loses 2nd mental health damages case in one week:

Meta loses 2nd mental health damages case in one week

A Los Angeles jury has found Meta and YouTube liable in a landmark lawsuit claiming the companies knew their products were dangerous and addictive to children. A New Mexico jury ruled against Meta in a similar case earlier this week.

The settlement comes after Meta lost both phases of a landmark lawsuit brought by New Mexico. ⁠A jury ⁠in March ordered it to pay $375 million US after finding ​it had misled consumers about the safety of its platforms. On Aug. 6, a judge found Meta had created a public nuisance and ordered it to ​pay an additional $567 million US and implement youth safety ⁠measures.

Also in March, the first trial over an individual’s claims against Meta and Google ended with a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. A Los Angeles jury found the companies liable for plaintiff Kaley G.M.’s depression and anxiety and ordered them to pay a combined $6 million US in damages.

The companies have said they will appeal those verdicts. All four companies settled the first case set for trial in federal court, where a Kentucky school district alleged they were liable for harm to students. Breathitt County School District ⁠was set to receive a combined $27 million, ‌public records showed.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    TMU shows what not to do with independent investigations

    The record does, however, establish that three of its members, James Turk, Jeffrey Wilkinson and Sameh Al Natour, took a public position incompatible with one of Benotto’s primary recommendations, by…

    Oil prices tumble amid renewed optimism over the Strait of Hormuz

    Oil prices tumbled Wednesday for the third straight day, as a flurry of headlines from the Middle East sparked renewed optimism in global markets. As of early Wednesday morning, U.S.…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Judge channels Dolly Parton in blocking Texas drag show ban

    Judge channels Dolly Parton in blocking Texas drag show ban

    NC State vs. Virginia odds: Proven model reveals picks for Week 0 game

    NC State vs. Virginia odds: Proven model reveals picks for Week 0 game

    All the Canadian Politics!

    TMU shows what not to do with independent investigations

    What’s The Difference Between WAN And LAN?

    What’s The Difference Between WAN And LAN?

    Oil prices tumble amid renewed optimism over the Strait of Hormuz

    Oil prices tumble amid renewed optimism over the Strait of Hormuz