Judge temporarily freezes payments from Trump administration’s ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’


A federal judge in Virginia on Friday ordered a temporary freeze on any payments coming from the Trump administration’s “Anti-Weaponization Fund” as she considers arguments in a lawsuit brought by a former Jan. 6 prosecutor to block the fund permanently. 

The order from U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema specifically bars the administration “from taking any further action pursuant to the creation or operation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund,” including transfers of money or consideration of claims from individuals who may argue they are victims of political persecution. 

The $1.776 billion fund, announced last week, was established by the Justice Department to compensate those who allege they were wrongly targeted under the Biden administration.

It was created in exchange for President Donald Trump agreeing to drop his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS as well as two civil claims for $230 million related to the Russia collusion investigation he faced during his first term in office and the 2022 search of his Mar-a-Lago estate — sparking accusations of self-dealing and a bipartisan uproar over the possible use of taxpayer money to pay rioters who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

President Donald Trump listens during a Cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House, May 27, 2026 in Washington.

Kent Nishimura/AFP via Getty Images

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, pressed about the fund earlier this month, said, “Anybody in this country is eligible to apply if they believe they’re a victim of weaponization.”

Friday’s order did not weigh in on the legal merits of the case brought by former Jan. 6 prosecutor Andrew Floyd and other plaintiffs suing under the basis that the fund is unlawfully discriminatory under claims that it would only presumably benefit political allies of President Trump. 

Judge Brinkema ordered an expedited briefing schedule in the lawsuit and a hearing set for Friday, June 12, to consider whether to grant a longer term freeze barring the administration from moving forward with the fund. 



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Chicago teen detained by ICE, taken to 6 states, describes arrest: "They didn't tell me why"

    Ricardo Hernandez-Navarrete, 18, was detained by ICE when he and his mom attended a routine immigration appointment. He just graduated high school after months in custody in six different states.…

    Live updates: Scripps National Spelling Bee is down to four finalists — Quick Post

    Additional content for the story Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Protein traffic jams may explain aging, memory loss, and Alzheimer’s

    Protein traffic jams may explain aging, memory loss, and Alzheimer’s

    Infinix x PUBG MOBILE – IGN

    Infinix x PUBG MOBILE – IGN

    The SR-71 Blackbird’s Secret Drone Sibling Flew 4 Missions & Failed Every One

    The SR-71 Blackbird’s Secret Drone Sibling Flew 4 Missions & Failed Every One

    Trump’s Boat Strikes Have Failed to Curb Cocaine Flow to U.S., Experts Say

    Trump’s Boat Strikes Have Failed to Curb Cocaine Flow to U.S., Experts Say

    Ebola outbreak is ‘very complex,’ but ‘can be stopped’, WHO chief says – National

    Ebola outbreak is ‘very complex,’ but ‘can be stopped’, WHO chief says – National

    Judge temporarily freezes payments from Trump administration’s ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’

    Judge temporarily freezes payments from Trump administration’s ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’