Appeals court blocks removal of transgender troops, but allows restrictions on recruits


A federal appeals court on Monday concluded that the Trump administration’s transgender military ban is likely unconstitutional and “appears to be driven by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group.”

In a 2-1 decision, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s decision blocking the Department of Defense from removing current servicemembers because of their gender dysphoria. 

“At this preliminary stage, I conclude that the Hegseth Policy is both arbitrary and based upon animus, and for those reasons the Policy violates Plaintiff-Appellees’ constitutional right to equal protection of the law,” wrote Judge Robert Wilkins, referring to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

The decision only applies to the service members who sued the administration and does not bar the Pentagon from blocking transgender people from joining the military.

According to the court, prospective military members can seek relief after the case has completely moved through the courts, while active service members face a more serious hardship by being expelled from the military. 

“For those servicemembers facing expulsion, it is not clear how easily they can be reinstated and made whole. But even if they can be reinstated after being separated, it appears to us to be a much greater hardship to end a military career than to delay the start of one,” Judge Wilkins wrote. 

In this undated file photo, the Pentagon is shown.

Douglas Rissing/Getty Images

Judge Justin Walker — the sole judge on the panel appointed to the bench by a Republican president — dissented and said members of the military could be deprived of certain rights guaranteed to the civilians. 

“Like today’s majority, I cherish those rights, and so I understand the impulse behind the majority’s unprecedented intervention into military affairs. But because the plaintiffs are service members not civilians, and because we are judges not generals, I respectfully dissent,” he wrote.

“We have neither the expertise nor the authority to decide whether the military can exclude the plaintiffs from its ranks. The Constitution assigns that authority to Congress and the Commander in Chief,” he added.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Losing Trust in Justice Dept., Judges Call Out Its Lawyers’ Behavior

    In late April, a lawyer for the Justice Department told a federal judge that her colleagues had been in the midst of negotiations with a Rhode Island hospital about turning…

    Divided appeals court rules Trump administration’s ban on transgender military service is unconstitutional

    Washington — A divided federal appeals court ruled Monday that the Trump administration’s policy banning transgender individuals from serving in the military is likely unconstitutional. A panel of three judges…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Democrats think their secret sauce in 2026 is targeting Trump and Republicans on ‘corruption’

    Democrats think their secret sauce in 2026 is targeting Trump and Republicans on ‘corruption’

    StarCraft 2’s Biggest Update In Years Will “Shake Up Everything”

    StarCraft 2’s Biggest Update In Years Will “Shake Up Everything”

    Europe is running from a phantom China threat

    Using AI for retirement investment advice? It can be risky, experts caution – National

    Using AI for retirement investment advice? It can be risky, experts caution – National

    How A Plane Built In 1968 Became The Most Strategically Important Aircraft In The US Military Today

    How A Plane Built In 1968 Became The Most Strategically Important Aircraft In The US Military Today

    Losing Trust in Justice Dept., Judges Call Out Its Lawyers’ Behavior

    Losing Trust in Justice Dept., Judges Call Out Its Lawyers’ Behavior