This and that for your Sunday reading.

– Gregg Gonsalves discusses the Trump regime’s plan to politicize every single dollar of federal revenue and expenditure in the U.S., setting up a ruthlessly efficient mechanism for executive grift and extortion at the expense of democratically-determined decision-making. Which means that Americans already struggling to keep afloat can only expect matters to get worse as long as Trump and his courtiers hold power. And Will Saletan highlights how the U.S.’ foreign policy is similarly aimed at enriching Trump rather than any national or humanitarian interest. 

– Meanwhile, Kim Kelly points out the dark historical parallels to the unconscionable sentences for guilt by association applied to the Prairieland political prisoners. Matthew Gault reports on the criminalization of dissent in the form of merely speaking out against data centres at a public meeting. And Sean O’Kane reports on yet another techbro – this time Peter Diamandis – stating the public intention to inflict unaccountable surveillance on the general public in order to keep people in line. 

– Julia Jacobo discusses the increasing number of people facing heat stress around the globe, while Ajit Niranjan comments on the lack of preparation for global warming which has long been predicted. And Michael Le Page warns that there’s far worse to come due both to the damage we’ve already done to our living environment, and our absolute failure to rein in the carbon pollution that’s causing it to break down. 

– Meanwhile, if anybody needed a reminder that responsible policy can eradicate avoidable risks, Aitor Hernandez-Morales reports on Helsinki’s year without a single traffic-related death. And Alexandra Frost reports on the HPV vaccine’s success in preventing UK deaths from cervical cancer. 

– Finally, Graeme Bayliss rightly questions why Mark Carney is consistently choosing to copy the Trump regime rather than resisting it as promised.