The US Supreme Court Restricts Use Of Geofence Warrants



This is a big win for privacy rights.

The US Supreme Court just issued a ruling that limits geofence searches by law enforcement agencies, which could have major ramifications for privacy rights across the country. For the uninitiated, this is a relatively recent law enforcement technique in which police tap into the databases of tech companies to see who was near the scene of a crime.

In the 6-3 ruling, the country’s top court said that “an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone location information.” Justice Elena Kagan said that geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches. Moving forward, law enforcement will have to obtain an actual search warrant to force a tech company into handing over geofence location data. Search warrants require probable cause, which geofence warrants do not.

The case that led to this decision involves a robbery in Virginia, according to a report by NPR. A man stole $195,000 from a bank and the case went cold until detectives served Google with a geofence warrant. They obtained location information of cellphone users near the bank for the hour before and after the crime was committed.

Google pushed back in a way, providing the police with just three of the 19 people tagged as being near the bank. However, one of these three ended up being the culprit.

Okello Chatrie confessed but his attorneys argued in filings that geofence searches violate the Fourth Amendment, as they allow government entities to “search first and develop suspicions later.” In this instance, the geofence search mandated that Google pore through the data of millions of users. In other words, these people were searched without having done anything suspicious.

We don’t know how today’s ruling will impact past court cases that used geofence warrants. The ruling isn’t expected to change Chatrie’s sentence, according to a report by TechCrunch.

As for the government, it argued in its filings that location data isn’t constitutionally protected on the grounds that people “choose” to hand it over by failing to disable system-wide geotracking services and background app tracking on phones.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Supreme Court Supports Privacy Protections for Cellphone Location Data

    The US Supreme Court ruled on Monday that law enforcement agencies must obtain a valid warrant before conducting geofence searches, reaffirming that probable cause is required to subpoena cellphone location…

    OpenAI is teasing new hardware… for Codex

    OpenAI is releasing some sort of device related to its AI-powered coding tool, Codex, on July 15th. In a video posted to X on Monday, OpenAI shows a square-shaped device…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    It’s official: Germany are no longer a soccer superpower

    It’s official: Germany are no longer a soccer superpower

    Senator Gallego’s Use of Campaign Funds for Family Trips Prompts Scrutiny

    Senator Gallego’s Use of Campaign Funds for Family Trips Prompts Scrutiny

    Supreme Court Supports Privacy Protections for Cellphone Location Data

    Supreme Court Supports Privacy Protections for Cellphone Location Data

    Paraguay celebra su pase a cuartos y Marruecos junto a Países Bajos encienden México

    Paraguay celebra su pase a cuartos y Marruecos junto a Países Bajos encienden México

    Jaeger-LeCoultre Taps French Actor Omar Sy as Friend of the House

    Jaeger-LeCoultre Taps French Actor Omar Sy as Friend of the House

    Aftershock frays nerves as many Venezuelans left to fend for themselves

    Aftershock frays nerves as many Venezuelans left to fend for themselves