RIP social media. What comes next is messy.



Last fall, we featured an extensive interview with Petter Törnberg of the University of Amsterdam, who studies the underlying mechanisms of social media that give rise to its worst aspects: the partisan echo chambers, the concentration of influence among a small group of elite users (attention inequality), and the amplification of the most extreme divisive voices. He wasn’t optimistic about social media’s future.

Törnberg’s research showed that, while numerous platform-level intervention strategies have been proposed to combat these issues, none are likely to be effective. And it’s not the fault of much-hated algorithms, non-chronological feeds, or our human proclivity for seeking out negativity. Rather, the dynamics that give rise to all those negative outcomes are structurally embedded in the very architecture of social media. So we’re probably doomed to endless toxic feedback loops unless someone hits upon a brilliant fundamental redesign that manages to change those dynamics.

Törnberg has been very busy since then, producing two new papers and one new preprint building on this realization that social media is structured quite differently than the physical world, with unexpected downstream consequences. The first new paper, published in PLoS ONE, specifically focused on the echo chamber effect, using the same combined standard agent-based modeling with large language models (LLMs)—essentially creating little AI personas to simulate online social media behavior.

Those simulated users were randomly programmed to either hold an opinion or its opposite and then interact randomly with selected members of a simulated online community. And if the proportion of community members who disagreed with those simulated users exceeded a given threshold, those agents were programmed to leave and join a different online community.

Filter bubbles: Not a culprit, but a cure

Consistent with last year’s results, it turns out that echo chambers emerge naturally from the basic architecture of social media platforms. “One surprising finding is the fact that we get echo chambers even without any filter bubbles, even if people really love being in diverse spaces,” said Törnberg. “You don’t need an algorithmic nudge. You can still get these highly segregated spaces. The other surprising finding is that filter bubbles, which have been blamed for homogeneity, can be a cure.”



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Ted Lasso is still my favorite feel-good show

    Hi, friends! Welcome to Installer No. 139, your guide to the best and Verge-iest stuff in the world. (If you’re new here, welcome, barbecue sauce, and also you can read…

    The world’s biggest solar telescope caught vortexes on the Sun’s surface

    For the observer hovering above one of these boundaries, Kuridze says, the view would depend on the time of arrival. The instability runs through two phases. “The first is the…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    US pledges $1bn support to Colombia as Trump-backed president sworn in

    US pledges $1bn support to Colombia as Trump-backed president sworn in

    U.S. booze might end up back on Canadian shelves, but have we lost the taste for it?

    U.S. booze might end up back on Canadian shelves, but have we lost the taste for it?

    Amit Uniyal named head coach as Punjab overhaul backroom staff

    Amit Uniyal named head coach as Punjab overhaul backroom staff

    Backgrounder – Additional sanctions in response to ongoing conflict in Sudan

    Why is gaming giant Roblox losing tens of billions in market value?

    Why is gaming giant Roblox losing tens of billions in market value?

    The Uplift: Hot ones

    The Uplift: Hot ones