Perplexity Has Successfully Overturned Amazon’s Injunction On Its AI Shopping Bot


Amazon’s public fight with Perplexity over online shopping started in November 2025.

Perplexity has successfully overturned an injunction that banned the AI shopping tool built into its Comet browser from accessing Amazon, Bloomberg reports. According to an opinion from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Amazon’s original claim that Perplexity violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) doesn’t hold up to scrutiny and shouldn’t have been rewarded with an injunction.

Successfully claiming that Perplexity violated the law requires Amazon to prove that the company intentionally accessed a computer without authorization, obtained information from that protected computer and that there was a loss “to one or more persons during any one-year period” that averaged at least $5,000 in value. Because Comet, Perplexity’s AI browser, requires user direction to use Amazon on its own, the appeals court determined it was the Comet user who was accessing Amazon’s “computers” (the servers that host Amazon.com) and not Perplexity itself.

Per the court, an injunction “against conduct that likely does not violate the CFAA or the CDAFA would not serve the public interest.” Additionally, the harm Amazon could suffer by letting Perplexity offer Comet’s shopping capabilities didn’t warrant an injunction in the first place.

“We respectfully disagree with today’s decision on the preliminary injunction,” Amazon said in a statement to Engadget. “We remain confident in our case and are evaluating our next steps.”

Amazon sent Perplexity a cease-and-desist letter in November 2025 demanding that it block its AI browser from accessing Amazon’s online store. According to Amazon, both companies had agreed to an earlier pause on agentic shopping in 2024, but Perplexity went back on the agreement and re-enabled the feature by disguising Comet’s AI bot as a normal Chrome browser. In response, Amazon filed a lawsuit against Perplexity in March 2026 and was awarded a temporary injunction not long after.

While the appeals court decision eliminates Amazon’s injunction, it doesn’t close the case in either company’s favor. Amazon can ask for a rehearing or ask the Supreme Court for a review. And even if it doesn’t pursue either option, the company’s lawsuit will still play out in the San Francisco federal court where it was originally filed, giving Amazon another opportunity to argue its case.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Tom DeLay helped create TV ownership cap—he says Trump FCC has no authority to repeal it

    DeLay explains how Congress decided on 39% cap Courts reviewing whether an agency decision is lawful often try to determine what members of Congress intended when they passed a law,…

    Purple Promo Codes and Deals: Up to 30% Off

    Good sleep is a priceless commodity, and a big factor is what you’re sleeping on, including your mattress and pillows. Purple is one of our favorites on that front, from…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    El-Sayed holds narrow lead in Michigan Senate primary but race too close to call | US midterm elections 2026

    El-Sayed holds narrow lead in Michigan Senate primary but race too close to call | US midterm elections 2026

    National Trust expands park by 32 hectares in Saltram

    National Trust expands park by 32 hectares in Saltram

    Statement on protection of journalists in Gaza

    Statement on protection of journalists in Gaza

    Hacked Bitcoin Wallet Maker Warns of AI Failure to Detect Bug

    Tom DeLay helped create TV ownership cap—he says Trump FCC has no authority to repeal it

    Tom DeLay helped create TV ownership cap—he says Trump FCC has no authority to repeal it

    Why Nearly Every Aircraft Crossing The Atlantic Flies 1-2 Miles Off Its Track

    Why Nearly Every Aircraft Crossing The Atlantic Flies 1-2 Miles Off Its Track