No difference between suspending and amending DRIPA, says First Nations leader


Judith Sayers, president of the Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council, says the climate for reconciliation during the proposed three-year suspension may have changed, and it is not clear if the courts will have ruled on two decisions being appealed.

A First Nations leader in B.C. says Premier David Eby’s plan to suspend the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act will create less certainty, especially because the NDP may not be in government three years from now.

Judith Sayers, president of the Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council, says the climate for reconciliation during the proposed three-year suspension may have changed, and it is not clear if the courts will have ruled on two decisions being appealed.

The so-called DRIPA legislation is at the centre of legal trouble for Eby’s government after it was cited by First Nations in two landmark court cases that raised questions of land rights and B.C.’s mineral rights.

Sayers says suspending the legislation passed unanimously in 2019 would have the same effect as amending it, and she and other leaders are still forming their response to Eby’s plan.

The premier has framed his proposal as an alternative to permanently amending DRIPA to give the Supreme Court of Canada time to resolve the mineral rights case, the first case expected to make it to the high court.

In a leaked transcript obtained by The Canadian Press of a meeting between Eby and First Nations leaders, Eby said the mineral rights case forces government to insert the UN declaration across all its laws but government lacks staff and political capital to do that.

Sayers says she believes that suspending sections of DRIPA would create more, not less certainty, by inviting further legal actions from First Nations.

She says First Nations leaders are still reviewing their options, but she notes that Eby would be violating the UN declaration if he goes ahead with his plans because it needs collaboration leading to free and prior consent.

Suspending parts of the act would require legislation, and the transcript of the meeting says the government plans to table that legislation next week.

Sayers says suspending DRIPA “tarnishes the images of British Columbia in the international community, because (B.C. legislators) were the ones, who did this first” and they “were so proud of that.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 6. 2026.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Canada Gazette – Part I, October 14, 2023, volume 157, number 41

    The Canada Gazette, Part I, consists of a weekly issue, published every Saturday; a quarterly index, published every three months; and extra editions, published only when required under special circumstances…

    Backgrounder: Minister Anand announces funding to promote Indigenous voices on the world stage

    The Honourable Anita Anand, Minister of Foreign Affairs, announced that Global Affairs Canada will provide $3 million to the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights for the…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Air Taxis Could Begin Flying From Orlando Airport “Later This Year,” Executive Says

    Air Taxis Could Begin Flying From Orlando Airport “Later This Year,” Executive Says

    Paris and Berlin vow to align on tougher trade measures against China

    Canada Gazette – Part I, October 14, 2023, volume 157, number 41

    CTV Vancouver parts ways with financial advisor ordered to halt trades, promotions

    CTV Vancouver parts ways with financial advisor ordered to halt trades, promotions

    Innu inquiry formal hearings draw to a close as parties give final submissions

    Innu inquiry formal hearings draw to a close as parties give final submissions

    ICE Is Using Data Broker Tools to ‘Identify Unaccompanied Minors’ and ‘Fraud’

    ICE Is Using Data Broker Tools to ‘Identify Unaccompanied Minors’ and ‘Fraud’