Live Updates: Lindsay Clancy murder trial ends with hung jury, mistrial declared


 

Is mistrial a “win” for Lindsay Clancy’s defense?

WBZ-TV legal analyst Jennifer Roman was asked if a mistrial would be considered a “win” for Lindsay Clancy’s defense. 

“I think a mistrial for the defense is favorable to a guilty finding, for sure,” Roman said. “I’m not sure that it’s necessarily a win. I think that Lindsay Clancy and her team, along with every other person involved in this case, would like resolution and would like this to be done. Certainly, if there’s a mistrial, there’s a very real possibility the case would be tried again.”

Roman added that the most likely scenario would be that there is another trial.

“And that, you know, just the thought of that carries a certain weight to it, and a certain emotional impact, I think, for everybody involved,” Roman said.

 

David Yannetti on what it’s like dealing with a deadlocked jury

David Yannetti, who was Karen Read’s attorney during her two trials, spoke to WBZ-TV about the feeling attorneys have when juries are deadlocked.

“It is a very difficult position to be in. It can be upsetting. Speaking from experience, during the first Karen Read trial, this is pretty much how it went for us. We sent the jury out and we were very confident we had persuaded everybody that they should come back not guilty. We expected a quick verdict despite the length of the trial,” Yannetti said. “And when it dragged on, you can’t help but speculate on, what’s going on in there? How can somebody not go along with us? Who’s fighting? Who’s with us, who’s not? And you have zero answers because nobody’s in that jury room.”  

Yannetti added that the deadlocked jury means defense attorney Kevin Reddington presented a successful case.

“He has persuaded some on the jury, in my view, that she should not be convicted, and the reason is lack of criminal responsibility,” Yannetti said. 

 

Mental health resources

Much of the Lindsay Clancy trial testimony revolved around mental health issues, including suicide. 

If you or someone you know is in emotional distress or a suicidal crisis, you can reach the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988. You can also chat with the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline here.

For more information about mental healthcare resources and support, the National Alliance on Mental Illness HelpLine can be reached Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. ET, at 1-800-950-NAMI (6264) or email info@nami.org.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Why is New Jersey taking the legal battle over prediction markets to the Supreme Court?

    New Jersey has asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on a nationwide legal battle pitting dozens of states against online prediction markets. The request this week arrived days after…

    Judge in Lindsay Clancy trial declines to remove juror as deliberations continue

    Judge William Sullivan has declined to remove or further question a juror that the defense says is holding up a not-guilty verdict in the trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Nearly impossible? How Fairphone built the ethical, repairable Fairphone Gen 6+.

    Nearly impossible? How Fairphone built the ethical, repairable Fairphone Gen 6+.

    CBS Sports – News, Live Scores, Schedules, Fantasy Games, Video and more.

    CBS Sports – News, Live Scores, Schedules, Fantasy Games, Video and more.

    Global Airlines’ Airbus A380 Hasn’t Flown For A Year… What’s Next?

    Global Airlines’ Airbus A380 Hasn’t Flown For A Year… What’s Next?

    Media Freedom Coalition statement on Evan Gershkovich’s Trial

    Media Freedom Coalition statement on Evan Gershkovich’s Trial

    Approval of the Issuer’s position statement relating to the voluntary totalitarian tender offer promoted by TML CV Holdings B.V. for all issued common shares of Iveco Group N.V.

    Why is New Jersey taking the legal battle over prediction markets to the Supreme Court?

    Why is New Jersey taking the legal battle over prediction markets to the Supreme Court?