Jura Energy Corporation Provides Update on English High Court Proceedings


Following the return hearing, the Court declined to continue the domestic freezing injunction, concluding that FHL and Spud had not established the required real risk of dissipation of assets. The Court also ordered FHL and Spud to pay costs to a third party involved in the proceedings in the amount of GBP 125,000 and costs to PEL in the amount of GBP 145,000. The costs award to PEL was, however, made contingent on PEL having paid its amounts due under the arbitral awards made in favour of FHL and Spud.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    My excellent Conversation with Luis Garicano

    Here is the audio, video, and transcript.  Here is part of the episode summary: Tyler and Luis start their conversation with Spain — housing, NIMBYism, and the productivity crisis; Spanish…

    Continue reading
    B.C. NDP, Conservatives bicker over credit for LNG story

    If these people had any manners, they would both just graciously note the other side’s contribution and smile for the cameras. If you put the competing politicians together in a…

    Continue reading

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Flex your football brain with our daily quizzes

    Flex your football brain with our daily quizzes

    Can good design stop content creators from having sex in robotaxis?

    Can good design stop content creators from having sex in robotaxis?

    10 Affordable Makeup Brands With Clean Ingredients

    10 Affordable Makeup Brands With Clean Ingredients

    Hotels.com Coupon Codes for October 2026

    Hotels.com Coupon Codes for October 2026

    Cornell Title IX investigation docs reveal new details on rape investigation

    Cornell Title IX investigation docs reveal new details on rape investigation

    Browns best Steelers, take lead in AFC North

    Browns best Steelers, take lead in AFC North