Federal judge dismisses DOJ lawsuit against Arizona seeking voter data


PHOENIX (AP) — A federal judge on Tuesday dismissed a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit against Arizona seeking access to the state’s detailed voter records, the latest legal setback in a nationwide effort by the Trump administration.

U.S. District Judge Susan Brnovich, a Trump appointee, wrote that Arizona’s statewide voter registration list is “not a document subject to request by the Attorney General” under federal law. The judge dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice because, she wrote, “amendment would be legally futile.”

The dismissal of the Arizona lawsuit follows a string of other rulings against the Department of Justice in similar cases in other states. The DOJ has sued at least 30 states and the District of Columbia seeking to force release of detailed voter data, which includes dates of birth, addresses, driver’s license numbers and partial Social Security numbers.

In addition to Arizona, judges have rejected those attempts in Rhode Island, California, Massachusetts, Michigan and Oregon. In Georgia, a judge dismissed a DOJ lawsuit because it had been filed in the wrong city, prompting the government to refile elsewhere.

The DOJ sued Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes in January for failing to comply with its request for the detailed voter information.

“This moment is a win for voter privacy,” Fontes said in a statement. “I will never comply with illegal requests that put Arizona voters in harms way.”

The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At least 13 states have either provided or promised to provide their detailed voter registration lists to the department, according to the Brennan Center and Associated Press reporting: Alaska, Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming.

Federal officials say they need the voter data to ensure that states are complying with federal election laws related to maintaining voter registration lists. In the Rhode Island case, a Justice Department attorney acknowledged that the department was seeking unredacted voter roll information so it could be shared with the Department of Homeland Security to check citizenship status.

Democratic and some Republican officials have objected to the requests and said such a demand violates state and federal privacy laws.

Josh Kelety, The Associated Press



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Are there downsides to liberal majorities?

    The Liberal Party of Canada can do anything it wants, with no objections. Opposition parties can’t even force an election due to their majority. Sure, this means that the Conservatives…

    New Democrats seek Emergency Debate on Trump’s threats to Canadian sovereignty « Canada’s NDP

    OTTAWA — As Donald Trump’s threats to Canada and our allies continue to mount, NDP Leader Don Davies today asked for an Emergency Debate in the House of Commons to…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Tomodachi Life: Living The Dream Won't Judge You If You're Horny

    Tomodachi Life: Living The Dream Won't Judge You If You're Horny

    Stockport 1 – 2 Port Vale

    Stockport 1 – 2 Port Vale

    Ottawa Redblacks take former Manitoba Bisons offensive lineman Vaccaro first overall in CFL draft – Winnipeg

    Ottawa Redblacks take former Manitoba Bisons offensive lineman Vaccaro first overall in CFL draft – Winnipeg

    OpenAI Really Wants Codex to Shut Up About Goblins

    OpenAI Really Wants Codex to Shut Up About Goblins

    Are there downsides to liberal majorities?

    St. Elias Mines Closes Financing