EFF Joins 60+ Groups Urging the UK to Halt Face Estimation at the Border



This week, EFF joined Foxglove, Human Rights Watch, and 60 other organizations in writing to the UK’s Minister of State for Border Security and Asylum, Alex Norris, raising serious concern about the Home Office’s decision to deploy Facial Age Estimation (FAE) to assess asylum-seeking children from 2027. 

The letter points to four key concerns:

Discrimination 

As with most face estimation and recognition tools, there is ongoing bias in the deployment of these technologies. With FAE, many have highlighted its baked-in failures and discrimination, particularly in relation to women and people of color. Evidence shows that FAE is most accurate for estimating the ages of Eastern European men, but even then it consistently produces errors. The Home Office itself noted “that FAE performance can vary depending on ethnicity” and skin tone. 

Inaccuracy

The Home Office has admitted that FAE systems are imprecise for analyzing 16-to 18-year-olds, with even the “top systems” having an “error margin of around 2.5 years here.” This is exactly the age range for which the Home Office has chosen to deploy this technology. And this error margin will be widened yet further because children seeking asylum often suffer from trauma-induced aging. 

Lawfulness of Use of Children’s Data

Major concerns exist around the lawful basis on which the Home Office, or its chosen third-party FAE vendors, could have sought consent to collect and process photographs or data from asylum-seeking children to train this system. Further, there is no clarity on the images and/or data that this technology has been trained on. 

Lack of Necessary Disclosure 

The Home Office claims “extensive testing has already been carried out across diverse groups, including different ethnicities, genders and age ranges, indicating promising performance and accuracy.” But these purported “promising” results have not been published, nor have any Equality or Data Protection Impact Assessments. 

The letter continues by requesting clarification on several key questions regarding these concerns. EFF and partners have provided the UK government 21 days for a response, and we urge the Home Office to take on this uphill task in good faith and release the information.

You can read the letter in full here



Source link

  • Related Posts

    The film about Sam Altman has been dropped by Amazon MGM

    Luca Guadagnino’s film about OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Artificial, has reportedly been dropped by Amazon MGM. The film, which stars Andrew Garfield and covers the rollercoaster five days in 2023…

    Rocket Report: Rebuild begins at Blue Origin launch pad; Relativity targets Mars

    New launch pad in the works at Cape Canaveral. Space Launch Delta 45, the military unit that runs Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, is exploring the potential creation of a…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Amrize to Modernize Montreal Area Cement Plant to be Most Advanced in Eastern Canada

    Carney government passes law allowing authorization of banned pesticides

    Carney government passes law allowing authorization of banned pesticides

    Five tips to keep your kids cool this weekend

    Five tips to keep your kids cool this weekend

    The film about Sam Altman has been dropped by Amazon MGM

    The film about Sam Altman has been dropped by Amazon MGM

    Ban vs Aus, 2nd men’s T20I – Matt Renshaw: Nice to realise that I’m good enough at this format

    Ban vs Aus, 2nd men’s T20I – Matt Renshaw: Nice to realise that I’m good enough at this format

    Take-Two’s ex-AI boss says the generative AI hype is “poisoning the well” and could ward off all use of traditional AI in the future

    Take-Two’s ex-AI boss says the generative AI hype is “poisoning the well” and could ward off all use of traditional AI in the future