dailynewsnblog
An Ontario Superior Court judge has struck down a rule that blocks travellers from sharing the outcome of passenger complaints made to the country’s transport regulator.
The ruling Wednesday found that regulations barring travellers from disclosing the result of complaints on matters ranging from accessible travel to compensation for a cancelled flight violate Canadians’ Charter right to freedom of expression.
The Canadian Transportation Agency’s complaint resolution process, in place since 2023, had prevented consumers and airlines from publicly disclosing such information unless both parties agreed to waive confidentiality.
Canada’s biggest airlines — including Air Canada, WestJet, Air Transat, Jazz Aviation and the industry group that represents them — had opposed the court challenge.
They argued complaint cases involve submissions with sensitive information that could undermine carriers’ commercial interests and create privacy risks for passengers and employees. They also claimed that safety could be compromised, as workers might think twice about disclosing problems that could result in more payouts to passengers.
But in his written decision, Justice Charles Hackland said there was no evidence that the confidentiality requirement “is necessary or required to achieve efficiency in the adjudication process or to prevent the release of confidential information.”
Hackland added the regulator is violating Canada’s open court principle when it enforces the confidentiality rule by refusing to release decisions, orders or other complaint-related documents upon request, including to the media.
Advocacy group Air Passenger Rights filed the constitutional challenge just over a year ago, arguing Canadians should have access to rulings by the quasi-judicial tribunal.
Gabor Lukacs, president of the group, had claimed the confidentiality rules amounted to a “gag order” that violates freedom of expression, accusing the airlines of not wanting “their dirty laundry in the open.”
He said in an interview Thursday that the ruling serves to empower customers who would no longer have to fear discussing the complaints process publicly.
Lukacs compared the complaints process to a “black box,” with tens of thousands of cases shrouded in mystery.
“Now we can actually say, ‘OK, was there any evidence to support what the airlines were saying?'” said Lukacs, adding only the airlines themselves had access to databases of rulings.
“What this is also going to create is a more level playing field. It’s not only airlines that have to know how those matters are being handled, but also passengers, and we who advocate for passengers.”
