Champagne says Conservative probes into Alto connection are ‘just politics’


OTTAWA — Finance Minister Francois Philippe Champagne is brushing off Conservative calls for an investigation into his personal relationship with an Alto executive and the proposed high-speed rail project as “just politics.”

Michael Barrett, the Conservative ethics critic, is trying to get the ethics committee to summon Champagne and Ethics Commissioner Konrad von Finckenstein to answer questions.

In September, Champagne recused himself from decisions about the high-speed rail project a month after his partner, Anne-Marie Gaudet, became an Alto vice-president.

“As far as I’m concerned, I’ve been very, very transparent, very upfront in a sense that you don’t need to take my words, but the words of the commissioner, who says not only there’s no conflict, but he said there’s no risk of conflict because Alto is a Crown corporation that reports to Parliament,” Champagne said during a media conference from Washington.

Barrett pointed out Thursday that Champagne introduced the omnibus budget bill, which includes funding for Alto to work on the rail project.

“Why wasn’t the bill with respect to the high-speed rail network act brought forward by the transport minister and not by the finance minister?” he said.

The Conservatives want the ethics committee to examine decisions made by the government about Alto since Gaudet’s hiring and accuse the Liberals of filibustering the request to prevent the study from happening.

Alto is the Crown corporation responsible for the $90-billion high-speed rail project that would connect Toronto and Quebec City.

Champagne said Friday he’s been very transparent about his personal relationship and that Finckenstein has been clear that there is no conflict of interest in this case.

“I’ve respected all the rules and that went even beyond what was suggested to me by the commissioner, to avoid any sense of potential or possible conflict of interest. So, you know, when you do all the right things you have to accept that the rest is just politics,” Champagne said.

Champagne said that ultimately MPs on the committee will decide who they want to call as witnesses.

Currently, the Bloc Québécois holds the deciding vote on the ethics committee, with an even split between Liberals and Conservatives. But the balance of power may shift if the Liberals use their new majority government to change the makeup of committees.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 17, 2026.

—With files from Sarah Ritchie.

David Baxter, The Canadian Press



Source link

  • Related Posts

    All the Canadian Politics!

    Canada’s population shrank last year — a first for the country, StatsCan says | CBC News Source link

    States eulogize Charlie Kirk with new laws promoting religion and free speech

    A new Kansas law will allow college students to sue their schools for free-speech violations. In Tennessee, a new law will encourage teachers and professors to include “the positive impacts…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Women’s Six Nations 2026: Galway-born Beibhinn Parsons not feeling extra pressure before Italy game

    Women’s Six Nations 2026: Galway-born Beibhinn Parsons not feeling extra pressure before Italy game

    Keke Palmer’s Must-Have Skin, Hair, and Makeup Items for 2026

    Keke Palmer’s Must-Have Skin, Hair, and Makeup Items for 2026

    Iran War Live Updates: Uncertainty Remains at Strait of Hormuz After Reopening Announcement

    Suspicion surrounds death of US influencer Ashly Robinson in Zanzibar | Tanzania

    Suspicion surrounds death of US influencer Ashly Robinson in Zanzibar | Tanzania

    The Shocking Secrets of Madison Square Garden’s Surveillance Machine

    The Shocking Secrets of Madison Square Garden’s Surveillance Machine

    All the Canadian Politics!