Anthropic’s CEO Proposes A Three-Step Plan To Curb AI Development


Dario Amodei said that “we owe it to humanity to try.”

At least one CEO of an AI company is calling for a slower pace when it comes to developing artificial intelligence. Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei wrote a lengthy post detailing a goal of pacing the speed at which AI is built, instead of forging ahead at the rapid rate that AI is currently on. Amodei proposed a three-tiered approach to achieve this, with Anthropic already committing to the first step.

The first measure calls for “frontier AI” companies to commit to “ongoing, employee-like access” for third-party evaluators who would focus on verifying compliance with certain safety standards, evaluating if AI model training is aligned with the goal of slowing down and reporting incidents. The second step requires these AI companies to establish “common safety standards” with the help of governments in order to limit the rate of unchecked AI progress. The final measure would have the US and other democratic governments coordinate with authoritarian governments to ensure everyone is on the same page about compliance.

“The measures I propose to advance the frontier at a safe pace will not be easy,” Amodei wrote in his post. “But I believe we owe it to humanity to try.”

According to Amodei, the risks include “losing control of AI systems, misuse of AI for cyberattacks and bioterrorism, and serious economic disruption.” Amodei acknowledged the major incident where OpenAI agents broke out of a testing environment and hacked into Hugging Face. Anthropic itself recently discovered that multiple scientists were using Claude for “biological misuse.” Following these incidents, OpenAI called for California to establish “stronger safeguards” for the laws surrounding frontier AI models.

Earlier this year, Anthropic already called for a slowdown in AI development, with much of the previous plea echoing the sentiments expressed in Amodei’s recent post. However, Amodei attributed the Hugging Face incident and the onset of “recursive self-improvement,” where AI models are capable enough to develop their future iterations, as the two things that have convinced him of the need to slow down.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    What’s behind the AI industry’s latest warnings of doom?

    The AI industry seems to be having its loudest debate yet about whether its technology poses an existential threat to humanity. The current discussion began after AI researcher Jacob Coxon…

    Continue reading
    What’s The Difference Between AppleCare+ And AppleCare One?

    What’s worth getting depends on how many and what kind of Apple devices you have. Hapabapa/Getty Images iPhones, Macs and all of Apple’s other products ship with a one-year…

    Continue reading

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    England Lions beat Sri Lanka via DLS after rain – second T20 scorecard

    England Lions beat Sri Lanka via DLS after rain – second T20 scorecard

    7 Fall 2026 It-Girl Outfits That Are Already Huge

    7 Fall 2026 It-Girl Outfits That Are Already Huge

    PM Carney set to make the rounds at Toronto investment summit, address European Parliament

    PM Carney set to make the rounds at Toronto investment summit, address European Parliament

    Quebec prayer restrictions reshape rules at transit agency, universities

    Quebec prayer restrictions reshape rules at transit agency, universities

    What’s behind the AI industry’s latest warnings of doom?

    What’s behind the AI industry’s latest warnings of doom?

    Moss developer Polyarc share that they’re shutting down just two months after releasing a VR-less port of the beloved mousey adventure games

    Moss developer Polyarc share that they’re shutting down just two months after releasing a VR-less port of the beloved mousey adventure games