The voluntary carbon market was built on a single promise: that one credit cancels one tonne. Most scrutiny has asked whether that promise holds on the supply side – whether the credits are real. This column asks a different question: what did the mere availability of offsets do to the firms that bought them? Using a buyer-linked dataset spanning the near-universe of offset retirements, and the 2023 integrity scandals as a natural experiment, the authors find that firms which walked away from offsetting cut their own operational emissions sharply more than firms that stayed. Even a market of flawless credits could still slow real decarbonisation.
Source link
Appointed Sen. Darline Graham advances to GOP Senate primary runoff in South Carolina
Appointed Sen. Darline Graham will compete in a Republican primary runoff for the party nomination for a full term, NBC News projects, though it’s not yet clear which opponent she’ll…






