Air France and Airbus guilty of corporate manslaughter for 2009 plane crash | Plane crashes


A Paris appeals court has found Airbus and Air France guilty of corporate manslaughter over the 2009 Rio-Paris plane crash that killed 228 passengers and crew in France’s worst air disaster.

The verdict is the latest milestone in a legal marathon involving two of France’s most emblematic companies and families of the mainly French, Brazilian and German victims.

Relatives of some of the 228 passengers and crew who died when the Airbus A330 vanished in darkness during an Atlantic storm gathered to hear the verdict after their 17-year legal battle to pinpoint blame for France’s worst air disaster.

The court ordered the companies to pay the maximum fine for corporate manslaughter, €225,000 (£194,500) each, after the request of prosecutors during the eight-week trial.

In 2023, a lower court had cleared the two companies, both of which have repeatedly denied the charges.

The maximum fines, amounting to just a few minutes of either company’s revenue, have been widely dismissed as a token penalty. But family groups have said a conviction would represent a recognition of their plight.

French lawyers have predicted further appeals to the country’s highest court, potentially dragging the process out for years more and prolonging the ordeal for relatives.

Flight AF447 vanished from radar screens on 1 June 2009, with people from 33 nationalities on board. The black boxes were recovered two years later after a deep-sea search.

In 2012, BEA crash investigators found the plane’s crew had pushed their jet into a stall, chopping lift from under the wings, after mishandling a problem to do with iced-up sensors.

Prosecutors, however, focused their attention on alleged failures inside both the planemaker and airline. Those included poor training and failing to follow up on earlier incidents.

To prove manslaughter, prosecutors needed not only to establish that the companies were guilty of negligence but pull the threads together to demonstrate how this caused the crash.

Under the French system, last year’s appeal proceedings involved a completely new trial with evidence reviewed from scratch. Any further appeals after Thursday’s verdict will shift the focus from the AF447 cockpit to intricacies of law.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    David Bercuson: Time for Carney to give up trying to send Trump a message over F-35s

    On June 22, 1940 the French Republic, led by the pro fascist former military hero of the First World War, General Phillipe Petain, surrendered to Nazi Germany. The once formidable…

    Stock markets open lower as bond yields near pre-Great Recession levels – National

    North American stock markets opened lower Thursday as oil prices rose and treasury yields resumed their climb amid the ongoing stalemate between Iran and the U.S. High yields slow economies…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    David Bercuson: Time for Carney to give up trying to send Trump a message over F-35s

    NYC and LA Are Teaming Up to Fight for EVs

    NYC and LA Are Teaming Up to Fight for EVs

    DP21513 The Design and Business Models of Financial Ratings

    Jordan Brand Introduces Tech-Loaded Triangle Shoe for $140

    Jordan Brand Introduces Tech-Loaded Triangle Shoe for $140

    Closing tax loophole for oil groups will fund cost of living package, says Reeves

    Supreme Court of Canada to decide whether to hear B.C. appeal in mineral claims case

    Supreme Court of Canada to decide whether to hear B.C. appeal in mineral claims case