Explained: Why Sourav Ganguly will attend BCCI’s AGM in Mumbai as VVS Laxman all set to get new role

Explained: Why Sourav Ganguly will attend BCCI’s AGM in Mumbai as VVS Laxman all set to get new role originally appeared on Cricket News. Add Cricket News as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

Sourav Ganguly will represent the Cricket Association of Bengal at the BCCI AGM on September 18 in Mumbai.
Four state associations, which include Hyderabad, Bihar, Meghalaya, and Arunachal Pradesh, will be unrepresented due to administrative issues.
Former international players Venkatesh Prasad and Saurabh Tiwary will represent Karnataka and Jharkhand, respectively.

Why Sourav Ganguly will attend BCCI’s AGM in Mumbai as VVS Laxman is all set to get a new role

Sourav Ganguly is finally returning to BCCI headquarters on September 18. But this time it will not be as board president but as the designated representative of the Cricket Association of Bengal.

The former India captain’s presence at the AGM in Mumbai marks his active involvement in state politics as the board prepares to navigate its latest administrative cycle.

The AGM will feature representatives from 31 of the 35 state units, with legal complications and internal governance deadlocks leaving state associations of Hyderabad, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, and Bihar unrepresented. Meanwhile, the Maharashtra Cricket Association will be represented by court-appointed administrator Govinda Sanap.

The meeting also underlines a continued trend of former international players taking up state-level governance roles. Ex-India seamer Venkatesh Prasad will represent Karnataka, while former middle-order batter Saurabh Tiwary attends on behalf of Jharkhand. Unmesh Khanvilkar will represent the host unit, the Mumbai Cricket Association.

MORE: BCCI crisis meeting in Mumbai! Gambhir, Agarkar & Saikia to review England defeats

Former India stars drive state representation as governance deadlocks in Mumbai

The exclusion of four state associations highlights ongoing administrative instability across several domestic centres. Hyderabad’s absence reflects long-standing governance disputes within the association, while legal and procedural hurdles have similarly sidelined Bihar, Meghalaya, and Arunachal Pradesh from participating in key board decisions.

With court-appointed oversight required for Maharashtra and four boards left out entirely, the meeting reflects a fragmented domestic landscape beneath the BCCI’s central authority. Establishing governance stability in these troubled state units remains an unfulfilled priority for the general body.

MORE: BCCI scheduling crisis threatens India’s WTC final bid: 60 players on NZ visa list amid overlapping Irani Cup & WI ODIs

The presence of Ganguly, Prasad, and Tiwary signals a growing reliance on former international cricketers to steer state politics. Ganguly’s return to the AGM floor as CAB chief gives Bengal a heavyweight voice during floor discussions, particularly regarding domestic scheduling and financial allocations.

For Jharkhand and Karnataka, deploying respected former international figures like Tiwary and Prasad ensures individuals with direct experience of both domestic and international cricket structures manage their state interests.

MORE: Agarkar set to retain BCCI chief selector post despite Laxman talks

State-level disenfranchisement undermines the BCCI’s executive polish

While the BCCI operates as the world’s wealthiest cricket body, having four state units entirely unrepresented at an Annual General Meeting is a stark reminder of domestic governance failures. Leaving full-member units like Hyderabad and Bihar without a voice at the national table compromises the equity of the board’s decision-making process.

Parading high-profile former captains like Ganguly on the AGM floor creates strong optics, but it does not mask the reality that multiple state associations remain paralysed by litigation and administrative infighting.

Meanwhile, in parallel to the state representation deadlocks, VVS Laxman’s ascent to the director of cricket reinforces a structural shift. Transitioning former senior players from coaching and pathways management into administrative roles has become the board’s preferred blueprint for operational governance.

Until the BCCI enforces strict, independent governance standards across all state affiliates, its annual meetings will remain vulnerable to internal factionalism.

For all the latest cricket news, opinion, and commentary, and to share your voice, head to our Facebook, Instagram, and X (Twitter) pages.

Source link