That AI Wearable You Don’t Like Just Got Worse



The new Friend pendant features a speaker, updated models and the same off-putting ideas about how humans should use AI.

Friend, the startup and AI pendant better known for its controversial ad campaign than being a usable product, is back. The company has announced a new version of its AI wearable that costs $249, still features an always-on microphone and now includes a built-in speaker so it can verbally respond to your questions.

While a speaker should make Friend more human-like, the basic premise of the device is the same as the original. Friend is a “wearable companion,” according to the company’s website, that’s designed to talk with you using its own randomized personality and voice. That used to only be delivered via push notifications sent by the pendant’s companion app, but can now come straight from the large circular puck itself. If it sounds strange or awkward to have an intimate conversation with an AI, that’s because it often is, as exemplified by Friend’s own launch video.

There’s ample evidence that relying on AI for emotional support can be dangerous. But creating controversy with Friend is apparently intentional, according to a Wired report on the pendant’s relaunch. “Reality is so over; everything is ironic now,” Avi Schiffmann, Friend’s founder, says. After Friend’s initial advertising campaign generated a negative response, Schiffmann deliberately leaned into the hate. Doubling down on the AI pendant now could be an attempt to drum up more.

Separate from whether it’s healthy to use AI like this or whether it’s an invasion of privacy, Friend is a lot more expensive than it was before. The original device cost $129. While the new $249 pendant features a speaker and updated AI models to formulate responses, Wired writes that a $10 per month subscription is now required for Friend to have a memory longer than 30 days. An AI pendant for nearly double the price and a monthly fee seems like a hard sell, but an AI friend that forgets you every 30 days might be worse.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Should You Avoid TP-Link Routers? Here’s What To Know

    When it’s less about the product and more about the FCC. AS photo family/Shutterstock TP-Link has long been a top router recommendation, including at Engadget. Its models tend…

    Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Friday, July 31

    Need some help with today’s Mini Crossword? It’s one of those tricky ones, where three clues all depend on each other. Read on for all the answers. Mini across clues…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Should You Avoid TP-Link Routers? Here’s What To Know

    Should You Avoid TP-Link Routers? Here’s What To Know

    FirstFT: Europe vows World Cup boycott in Fifa protest

    THE FIFTH COLUMN: Greenbelt Pathway July 1, 2026 Storm Damage Slideshow

    THE FIFTH COLUMN: Greenbelt Pathway July 1, 2026 Storm Damage Slideshow

    Fortescue Looks to Markets Outside China as CMRG Pressure Mounts

    ‘Blanket’ forced treatment of involuntary psychiatric patients unconstitutional, B.C. court rules

    ‘Blanket’ forced treatment of involuntary psychiatric patients unconstitutional, B.C. court rules

    The Single Remote Airport That Makes A South Pacific Crossing On The Airbus A350 Possible

    The Single Remote Airport That Makes A South Pacific Crossing On The Airbus A350 Possible