Solution to Feynman’s reverse sprinkler puzzle also applies to “silly sprinklers”



Watering your lawn in the summer can be both pragmatic and fun with so-called “silly sprinklers,” designed to create amusing loops and spirals of water jets. And there’s some fascinating physics at work to boot. Researchers at New York University’s Courant Institute conducted a series of experiments with different silly sprinkler designs to find the answer to a longstanding problem in fluid dynamics, according to a new paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

As previously reported, the reverse sprinkler problem is associated with physicist Richard Feynman because he popularized the concept, but it actually dates back to a chapter in Ernst Mach’s 1883 textbook The Science of Mechanics (Die Mechanik in Ihrer Entwicklung Historisch-Kritisch Dargerstellt). Mach’s thought experiment languished in relative obscurity until a group of Princeton University physicists began debating the issue in the 1940s.

Feynman was a graduate student there at the time and threw himself into the debate with gusto, even devising an experiment in the cyclotron laboratory to test his hypothesis. One might intuit that a reverse sprinkler would work just like a regular sprinkler, merely played backward, so to speak. But the physics turns out to be more complicated. “The answer is perfectly clear at first sight,” Feynman wrote in Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman (1985). “The trouble was, some guy would think it was perfectly clear [that the rotation would be] one way, and another guy would think it was perfectly clear the other way.”

Mach proposed that there would be no rotation with a reverse sprinkler: the reaction force on the nozzle as it sucks in water pulls the nozzle counter-clockwise, while the water flowing into the inside of the nozzle pushes it clockwise. The two forces cancel each other out in this steady-state scenario. Feynman’s own experiment showed a slight tremor when pressure was first applied to pump water through the nozzle, and then the sprinkler returned to its original position and remained still.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Sotheby’s Big T. Rex Auction Raises Concerns Hype and Wealth Are Upending Science

    Forget the sale of the century. The auction house Sotheby’s is gearing up for the sale of the epoch. On July 14 it will open live bidding on assorted fossils,…

    Pinwheel launches a retro-inspired landline phone for kids

    If you remember racing home after school to grab the family landline and call your best friend before dinner, a new device from Pinwheel is aiming to reboot that experience…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Brendon McCullum fronts up for final time after becoming Bazball’s fall guy

    Brendon McCullum fronts up for final time after becoming Bazball’s fall guy

    Following Xbox split, South of Midnight devs Compulsion are looking for work as a co-development or support studio

    Following Xbox split, South of Midnight devs Compulsion are looking for work as a co-development or support studio

    Ford government minister bills taxpayers $16K for Toronto hotels despite living in city

    Ford government minister bills taxpayers $16K for Toronto hotels despite living in city

    Rubio expands plans for high-level meeting focused on ‘far-left terrorism’

    Rubio expands plans for high-level meeting focused on ‘far-left terrorism’

    Sam Neill had pneumonia before his death, co-star says, as tributes pour in

    Sam Neill had pneumonia before his death, co-star says, as tributes pour in

    Sotheby’s Big T. Rex Auction Raises Concerns Hype and Wealth Are Upending Science

    Sotheby’s Big T. Rex Auction Raises Concerns Hype and Wealth Are Upending Science