Tyler, Nabeel, and Jackson on French thinkers


Nabeel: (57:47) …For example, there’s a French thinker called Jacques Derrida. I probably should go and read him at some point, but I’m not entirely convinced there is a there there, and I don’t know anyone who swears by it. If Tyler told me, “Nabeel, you are missing a big piece of your life by not reading him,” I would go read him tomorrow. But I don’t have any of those people.

Tyler: (58:44) Lacan is my marginal case of “no there there.” So Derrida, I put in a fair amount of effort and did conclude, rightly or wrongly, that there’s no there there. So you can, in my opinion, write him off. Lacan, I keep on wondering. Smart people still will say, “This is amazing.” I’ve tried a bunch of times, but I haven’t given up. There’s a new Lacan book coming out later this summer and I’ll try it again. We’ll see. That’s my marginal “is there a there there” figure.

Nabeel: (59:13) Yeah. I think modern French thinkers put too much of a premium on sounding cool, or postmodern philosophy generally. I think it repays some effort to kind of grasp the core ideas, but it doesn’t repay making it your life’s reading or something.

Tyler: (59:26) Baudrillard is quite good and Foucault is extremely interesting. So I’m not against “the French” in this period, but if they keep on not making sense, I feel I’m educated well enough.

Jackson: (59:37) You have a lot of context.

Tyler: (59:38) That at some point I can strike the ledger.

Nabeel: (59:41) I do—Nowadays, I just put Foucault through GPT and I just have GPT explain it to me, and that’s going to be good enough for now.

Tyler: (59:50) The problem with Foucault, I think, is so much of the history is wrong in a quite mundane way, so there’s something very problematic about it. But the stuff—I think it’s in a way quite simple, almost too simple. And the fact that the current right has so latched on to Foucault is a sign that it’s simple. I don’t mean necessarily bad, but there are these structures and they’re trying to tell you what to do. And there’s something anonymous about that as well. It’s not just the individuals who form the conspiracy. It’s how a lot of the world thinks today.

Here is the longer discussion, already linked to.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    What should I ask Michael Moritz?

    Yes I will be doing a Conversation with him, based around his new book Ausländer: One Family’s Story of Escape and Exile.  Mike of course was a pioneering venture capitalist through…

    Manu Koné: ”Lo di todo y estoy satisfecho por la victoria que conseguimos”

    IE 11 no es compatible. Para una experiencia óptima, visite nuestro sitio en otro navegador. SIGUIENTE Francia sufre en el avance a cuartos de final a causa de un Paraguay…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Trump delivers ominous warning to political opponents at America 250 event

    Trump delivers ominous warning to political opponents at America 250 event

    What should I ask Michael Moritz?

    What should I ask Michael Moritz?

    Ofsted drops ‘clumsy’ and ‘offensive’ guidance linking autism and extremism | Ofsted

    Ofsted drops ‘clumsy’ and ‘offensive’ guidance linking autism and extremism | Ofsted

    The secret to healthy aging may be hidden in your blood

    The secret to healthy aging may be hidden in your blood

    BBC Sport quiz: Who am I? Guess the tennis superstar no 6

    BBC Sport quiz: Who am I? Guess the tennis superstar no 6

    Sega Shares Sneak Peek Of Sonic’s New Animated Short

    Sega Shares Sneak Peek Of Sonic’s New Animated Short