2026 World Cup parlay, best bets: Top picks for matches on Saturday include Morocco, France


The Round of 16 at the 2026 World Cup has begun, and co-hosts Canada are out of the tournament after a 3-0 loss to Morocco in the early match. The second match of the day features France, back-to-back World Cup finalists and 2018 champions who are looking to keep rolling when they take on Paraguay at 5 p.m, ET. The South Americans pulled off the upset against four-time world champions Germany on Monday, winning in a penalty shootout after the game remained tied 1-1 after extra time. France are massive -600 favorites on the 90-minute money line in the World Cup 2026 odds at FanDuel, and Les Bleus are -2000 to advance to the quarterfinals.

We’ve taken a close look at the matchups and odds on both games and put together a parlay for Saturday’s Mexico vs. England match using odds from FanDuel. Before locking your wagers for Sunday’s matches, you should check out what SportsLine experts Jon Eimer, Martin Green and Brad Thomas are saying. Anyone following their World Cup betting advice at sportsbooks and on betting apps could have seen huge returns.

World Cup parlay for Saturday

  • Canada to score no goals vs. Morocco (+110) 
  • France-Paraguay Over 3.5 goals (+156)

FanDuel parlay price: +437

Canada to score no goals vs. Morocco

Canada needed more than 90 minutes to break through South Africa’s defense, which had admittedly been stellar in the competition. Morocco are a different beast entirely and possess plenty of attacking talent to give Canada fits on that end of the pitch. The Atlas Lions are feeling good after a penalty shootout win over Netherlands and they should be able to put the clamps on Canada in the Round of 16.

France-Paraguay Over 3.5 goals

The official line is 2.5, but France have scored at least three goals on their own in each match of this tournament so far. Paraguay battled admirably against Germany, but this French attack is clearly different. I don’t see the South American side containing the likes of Kylian Mbappe, Ousmane Dembele, Michael Olise and Co. for 90 minutes, but as long as they can get a goal themselves, the Over on 3.5 goals should hit.





Source link

  • Related Posts

    World Cup 2026: Reece James doubtful for Mexico tie but Jarell Quansah fit again

    Reece James missed England’s final training session before their World Cup last-16 tie against Mexico but Jarrell Quansah is available for selection again. Right-back James has missed England’s last two…

    World Cup Daily live: France vs. Paraguay; Canada out; Cape Verde overshadow Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce wedding

    We finally have 16 teams left in the 2026 FIFA World Cup and there are two matches this Saturday. Co-hosts Canada started things off with a loss to Morocco in…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Heat and severe storms damper July Fourth celebrations, leave hundreds of thousands without power

    Heat and severe storms damper July Fourth celebrations, leave hundreds of thousands without power

    World Cup 2026: Reece James doubtful for Mexico tie but Jarell Quansah fit again

    World Cup 2026: Reece James doubtful for Mexico tie but Jarell Quansah fit again

    What Squawk Code 7600 Means & Why It Is More Common Than Passengers Realize

    What Squawk Code 7600 Means & Why It Is More Common Than Passengers Realize

    In low budget box office hit Dear You, Beijing sees chance to court the diaspora

    In low budget box office hit Dear You, Beijing sees chance to court the diaspora

    U.S. debt is a looming crisis today but was once its own revolutionary masterstroke that helped launch a global financial superpower

    U.S. debt is a looming crisis today but was once its own revolutionary masterstroke that helped launch a global financial superpower

    The spectacle, the euphoria and the heartbreak of a World Cup. Was it worth the cost to the city?

    The spectacle, the euphoria and the heartbreak of a World Cup. Was it worth the cost to the city?