Why the world doesn’t recycle more nuclear waste


My reporting also helped answer another question that was lingering in my brain: Why doesn’t the world recycle more nuclear waste?

There’s still a lot of usable uranium in spent nuclear fuel when it’s pulled out of reactors. Getting more use out of the spent fuel could cut down on both waste and the need to mine new material, but the process is costly, complicated, and not 100% effective.

France has the largest and most established reprocessing program in the world today. The La Hague plant in northern France has the capacity to reprocess about 1,700 tons of spent fuel each year.

The plant uses a process called PUREX—spent fuel is dissolved in acid and goes through chemical processing to pull out the uranium and plutonium, which are then separated. The plutonium is used to make mixed oxide (or MOX) fuel, which can be used in a mixture to fuel conventional nuclear reactors or alone as fuel in some specialized designs. And the uranium can go on to be re-enriched and used in standard low-enriched uranium fuel.

Reprocessing can cut down on the total volume of high-level nuclear waste that needs special handling, says Allison Macfarlane, director of the school of public policy and global affairs at the University of British Columbia and a former chair of the NRC.

But there’s a bit of a catch. Today, the gold standard for permanent nuclear waste storage is a geological repository, a deep underground storage facility. Heat, not volume, is often the key limiting factor for how much material can be socked away in those facilities, depending on the specific repository. And spent MOX fuel gives off much more heat than conventional spent fuel, Macfarlane says. So even if there’s a smaller volume, the material might take up as much, or even more, space in a repository. 

It’s also tricky to make this a true loop: The uranium that’s produced from reprocessing is contaminated with isotopes that can be difficult to separate, Macfarlane says. Today, France essentially saves the uranium for possible future enrichment as a sort of strategic stockpile. (Historically, it’s also exported some to Russia for enrichment.) And while MOX fuel can be used in some reactors, once it is spent, it is technically challenging to reprocess. So today, the best case is that fuel could be used twice, not infinitely.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Fitbit’s AI health coach will soon be able to read your medical records

    Would you share your medical records with a personal trainer? How about a virtual one? Google, which this week announced it is giving Fitbit’s AI health coach the ability to…

    TCL’s German QLED ban puts pressure on TV brands to be more honest about QDs

    “Some products marketed as ‘QLED’ use conventional backlight architectures (standard phosphors, optical films, diffuser plates) and rely on picture modes or software tuning to create a more saturated ‘vivid’ look,”…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Bank of England holds main interest rate at 3.75% as Iran war jolts inflation expectations

    Bank of England holds main interest rate at 3.75% as Iran war jolts inflation expectations

    PwC partners who fail to embrace AI have no future at firm, US CEO warns | PwC

    PwC partners who fail to embrace AI have no future at firm, US CEO warns | PwC

    Fitbit’s AI health coach will soon be able to read your medical records

    Fitbit’s AI health coach will soon be able to read your medical records

    Tulsi Gabbard Declines to Say If Iran Posed an ‘Imminent Threat’

    Tulsi Gabbard Declines to Say If Iran Posed an ‘Imminent Threat’

    More Cesar Chavez Fallout Expected After Sex Abuse Accusations

    Trump threatens Iran’s South Pars gas field if strikes on Qatar continue

    Trump threatens Iran’s South Pars gas field if strikes on Qatar continue