Why even ‘perfect’ AI therapy may be structurally doomed


Here’s the crux of it: the main problem with AI therapy is that it’s too available. Too cheap to meter.

Let me put this in clearer terms: psychotherapy, in all its well-known guises, is something you engage in within a limited, time-bound frame. In today’s paradigm, whatever your therapist’s orientation, that tends to mean one 45- or 50-minute session a week; for the infinitesimally small minority of therapy patients in classical psychoanalysis, this can amount to 3, even 5, hours a week. And then at a much smaller scale population-wide, people in intensive outpatient and residential treatment programs may spend one or two dozen hours a week in therapy—albeit, mostly of the group variety.

I can think of other exotic cases, like some DBT therapists’ willingness to offer on-demand coaching calls during crisis situations—with the crucial exception that in these situations, therapists are holding the frame zealously, jealous of their own time and mindful of the risks of letting patients get too reliant.

So even under the most ideal of conditions, in which an LLM-based chatbot outmatches the best human therapists—attunes beautifully, offers the sense of being witnessed by a human with embodied experience, avoids sycophancy, and draws clear boundaries between therapeutic and non-therapeutic activities—there’s still a glaring, fundamental difference: that it’s functionally unlimited and unbounded…

But all else equal: does infinite, on-demand therapy—even assuming the highest quality per unit of therapeutic interaction—sound like a good idea to you? I can tell you, to me it does not. First of all, despite detractors’ claims to the contrary, the basic idea of therapy is not to make you dependent for life—but rather, to equip you to live more skillfully and with greater self-awareness. As integration specialists famously say of psychedelics, you can only incorporate so much insight, and practice skills so effectively, without the chance to digest what you’ve learned over time.

In other words, even in good old talk therapy, drinking from the hose without breaks for practice and introspection in a more organic context risks drowning out the chance for real change and practical insight. To my mind, this rhythm is the basic structural genius of psychotherapy as we know it—no matter the modality, no matter the diagnosis.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Telus, Rogers have most reliable cell networks, Bell has fastest 5G downloads: report

    A new report says Rogers and Telus have Canada’s most reliable and consistent mobile networks, while Bell maintains the best 5G download speeds of the major carriers. The annual study…

    OpenSynergy’s Blue SDK Now Drives More Than 400 Million Cars

    OpenSynergy brings over 25 years of experience in embedded software development. Our Blue SDK products offer the latest Bluetooth® technology features, including Channel Sounding and Auracast™, enabling diverse wireless applications…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Liberal party executive agrees to permanently bury review into catastrophic 2025 election defeat | Liberal party

    Liberal party executive agrees to permanently bury review into catastrophic 2025 election defeat | Liberal party

    Telus, Rogers have most reliable cell networks, Bell has fastest 5G downloads: report

    Telus, Rogers have most reliable cell networks, Bell has fastest 5G downloads: report

    Greens deal by-election blow to Labour

    Greens deal by-election blow to Labour

    Rising anger over ‘lop-sided’ and ‘immoral’ US health funding pacts with African countries | Global development

    Rising anger over ‘lop-sided’ and ‘immoral’ US health funding pacts with African countries | Global development

    An AI-generated Resident Evil Requiem review briefly made it on Metacritic

    An AI-generated Resident Evil Requiem review briefly made it on Metacritic

    Cadillac and Audi enter F1: Two teams with the same ambition but very different projects

    Cadillac and Audi enter F1: Two teams with the same ambition but very different projects