What to know about the Jones Act as the Trump administration unveils a 60-day waiver


NEW YORK (AP) — As the U.S. and Israel’s war against Iran continues to upend energy markets and supply chains worldwide, the Trump administration says it will temporarily waive maritime shipping requirements under a more than century-old law known as the Jones Act.

The Jones Act requires that goods hauled between U.S. ports be moved on U.S.-flagged vessels. Passed in 1920, this law aims to protect the American shipping sector — but it’s also faced criticism over the years for slowing the delivery of goods, including critical aid during time of crisis.

On Wednesday, the White House said that it would suspend Jones Act requirements for 60 days, in a measure that arrives amid wider efforts to counter steep oil prices and cargo disruptions due to the war. The Jones Act is often blamed for making gas, in particular, more expensive. Still, some analysts and industry groups say this waiver will do little to ease consumers’ fuel bills today.

Here’s what we know.

What is the Jones Act?

The Jones Act’s official name is the Merchant Marine Act of 1920. Congress passed the law — sponsored by Sen. Wesley Jones of Washington state — in an effort to rebuild U.S. shipping after German U-boats decimated America’s merchant flee during World War I.

Among other things, the Jones Act mandates that ships carrying cargo and passengers between U.S. ports must be built in the United States and owned by Americans — effectively prohibiting foreign-flagged ships from this domestic trade. The vessels are also required to carry U.S. crews.

The law can be waived in the “interest of national defense,” the U.S. Maritime Administration notes, either through the Homeland Security or Defense Department.

The Jones Act also was intended to ensure that the U.S. had its own merchant fleet in case of war. It’s been strongly supported by some U.S. shipping companies, national security advocates and organized labor. But cutting out foreign competition has also driven up the cost of carrying cargo domestically.

U.S.-flagged ships are generally more expensive to both operate and build than foreign ones. And those costs are especially damaging to states and territories that are supplied by sea, such as Hawaii and Puerto Rico.

Why is Trump waiving Jones Act requirements now?

Oil prices have spiked and swung rapidly since the start of the Iran war. Nearly all tanker movement in the key Strait of Hormuzremains at a halt, which has led major oil producers across the Middle East to cut production. Commercial ships — which, beyond fuel, haul cargo from pharmaceuticals to computer chips — have also been stalled at sea or faced attacks themselves.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    How to invest like you’re on a boat and sail through market volatility

    In investments, everyone should know the benefits of diversification. Owning different stocks, in different sectors and in different countries, can balance out market swings. It is one of the key…

    Ossoff questions Gabbard about Iran posing an ‘imminent nuclear threat’

    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Federal Reserve keeps interest rates unchanged 03:03 New report says Cesar Chavez sexually abused girls…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Capital One just launched a new travel app

    Capital One just launched a new travel app

    The 5 Oscars Red Carpet Trends I Loved As a Fashion Expert

    The 5 Oscars Red Carpet Trends I Loved As a Fashion Expert

    How to invest like you’re on a boat and sail through market volatility

    CUSMA review talks with Canada lagging behind Mexico, U.S. trade rep says – National

    CUSMA review talks with Canada lagging behind Mexico, U.S. trade rep says – National

    TSA says nearly 10% of its officers called out sick Tuesday

    TSA says nearly 10% of its officers called out sick Tuesday

    Ossoff questions Gabbard about Iran posing an ‘imminent nuclear threat’

    Ossoff questions Gabbard about Iran posing an ‘imminent nuclear threat’