Under Trump, EPA’s enforcement of environmental laws collapses, report finds



Another signal of declining enforcement: Through September of last year, the EPA issued $41 million in penalties—$8 million less than the same period in the first year of the Biden administration, after adjusting for inflation. This suggests “the Trump Administration may be letting more polluters get by with a slap on the wrist when the Administration does take enforcement action,” the report reads.

Combined, the lack of lawsuits, penalties, and other enforcement actions for environmental violations could impact communities across the country, said Erika Kranz, a senior staff attorney in the Environmental and Energy Law Program at Harvard Law School, who was not involved in the report.

“We’ve been seeing the administration deregulate by repealing rules and extending compliance deadlines, and this decline in enforcement action seems like yet another mechanism that the administration is using to de-emphasize environmental and public health protections,” Kranz said. “It all appears to be connected, and if you’re a person in the US who is worried about your health and the health of your neighbors generally, this certainly could have effects.”

The report notes that many court cases last longer than a year, so it will take time to get a clearer sense of how environmental enforcement is changing under the Trump administration. However, the early data compiled by the Environmental Integrity Project and other nonprofits shows a clear and steep shift away from legal actions against polluters.

Historically, administrations have a “lot of leeway on making enforcement decisions,” Kranz said. But this stark of a drop could prompt lawsuits against the Trump administration, she added.

“Given these big changes and trends, you might see groups arguing that this is more than just an exercise of discretion or choosing priorities [and] this is more of an abdication of an agency’s core mission and its statutory duties,” Kranz said. “I think it’s going to be interesting to see if groups make those arguments, and if they do, how courts look at them.”

This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy, and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Target Darts Omni Auto Scoring System Hits the Mark

    I never liked playing darts, but I did a complete 180 with this auto-scoring system. This gadget has ignited my newfound love of the old pub favorite. It’s a light…

    Reddit says it’s looking for more acquisitions in adtech and elsewhere

    Reddit is gearing up for more M&A, the company told analysts on its fourth-quarter earnings call on Thursday. Reddit CFO Andrew Vollero said the online forum site is looking for…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Target Darts Omni Auto Scoring System Hits the Mark

    Target Darts Omni Auto Scoring System Hits the Mark

    How AMD’s product pipeline stacks up with competitors

    How AMD’s product pipeline stacks up with competitors

    🚨 Official: Cádiz v Almería called off

    🚨 Official: Cádiz v Almería called off

    Trump housing policy is a mess and it won’t fix the US housing crisis | Housing market

    Trump housing policy is a mess and it won’t fix the US housing crisis | Housing market

    Demanding Support for Trump, Justice Dept. Struggles to Recruit Prosecutors

    Rust player says goodbye to his server neighbours by constructing a giant, illuminated middle finger: ‘Making one of these is often how I like to end a successful wipe’

    Rust player says goodbye to his server neighbours by constructing a giant, illuminated middle finger: ‘Making one of these is often how I like to end a successful wipe’