
I must say, I am feeling discouraged tonight:
– Poilievre went on Joe Rogan and Canadian media just ate it up. Then Poilievre gave a tone-deaf statement about what a great time he had in the United States! Christ, what an asshole!
– on Thursday we found out that Ayla Lucas, a seven-year-old autistic Canadian girl, is trapped, with her mother at the ICE Gestapo facility called Ursula- the Rio Grande Valley Central Processing Center in McAllen, Texas, where she is “wrapped in a mylar space blanket, sleeping on a floor mat, subjected to 24-hour lights, noise, overcrowding” No word on what Canada might be doing to get her out.
– Danielle Smith is trying to turn MAID into Alberta’s next anti-Ottawa controversy.
– Carney posted a joint statement today from Canada, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Japan about “readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage through the Strait”, so I am worried now about whether Trump and Israel and the Gulf states are going to drag us all into their damned Iran War. On Thursday evening’s The Rest Of the World post, Martinez says
…Seven nations signed Thursday. None committed forces. The joint statement is being presented in Washington as progress. Internationally, it is being read as the strongest form of “not yet” that diplomatic language allows…
So its time to take a little breather:
The Inconspicuous Consumption substack, by Paul Lukas reminds me of Reddit’s Mildly Interesting page. It is deeply goofy but surprisingly fascinating:
I was today year’s old when I discovered the Depths of Wikipedia account on Bluesky:
just two monks and a dream
[image or embed]
— depths of wikipedia (@depthsofwikipedia.bsky.social) February 9, 2026 at 2:19 PM
“prohibition in the united states” has this time lapse map that switches from folksy banjo music to ominous industrial sci-fi for the 15 seconds when alcohol was illegal nationwide
[image or embed]
— depths of wikipedia (@depthsofwikipedia.bsky.social) February 8, 2026 at 6:13 PM
[image or embed]
— depths of wikipedia (@depthsofwikipedia.bsky.social) February 8, 2026 at 5:00 PM
And do you know what makes this a great work of art?

…While critics and historians often guide us toward certain works, aesthetic judgment ultimately depends on direct experience. Philosophers have long argued that hearing others describe beauty cannot replace seeing it yourself. Immanuel Kant observed that even if many people praise a work, the viewer must still confront the object directly in order to judge its beauty. This insight explains why two people can stand before the same painting and react differently. The judgment arises from perception rather than instruction.
The method described here is not meant to replace deeper study of art history or symbolism. Instead, it offers a quick way to recognize whether a painting deserves closer attention. By noticing composition, light, emotion, and narrative, the viewer begins to see patterns that connect artworks across centuries. Renaissance painters perfected balance and perspective. Baroque masters explored dramatic illumination. Romantic artists emphasized emotional intensity and storytelling….
One of the interesting substacks I follow is Hansard Files, which finds and highlights events in Canadian history. Here’s a fascinating post about the Canadian Museum of Human Rights:
Back to the wars tomorrow….







