Tesla sues California DMV after it banned the term ‘Autopilot’


Tesla is suing California’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to reverse a ruling that prevented the automaker from using the terms “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” to sell cars, CNBC reported. That follows a December ruling by a California administrative law judge that forced Tesla to clean up its marketing language or risk a suspension of its sales license. Last week, the DMV determined that Tesla had made the necessary changes, including changing the name to “Full Self-Driving (Supervised),” and that no suspension would occur.

However, if you had “Tesla is going to sue them back” in your office pool, you can go ahead and claim your prize. The company filed a complaint on February 13 alleging that the DMV “wrongfully and baselessly” called Tesla a false advertiser. Calling the order “factually wrong” and “unconstitutional,” Tesla demanded that order be set aside.

The DMV had originally argued that Tesla’s terms for its driver assistance program gave consumers the impression that its cars were safe to drive without a human at the wheel. However, Tesla said that the DMV never proved that buyers were confused and that it was “impossible” to buy a Tesla without seeing “clear and repeated statements” that its systems aren’t fully autonomous.

Tesla’s appeal of the ruling isn’t a shocker given that the company is essentially betting its future on autonomous vehicles. CEO Elon Musk has long promised buyers that its vehicles would eventually become fully autonomous and that you’d even be able to rent them out to provide robo-taxi services. “If you fast forward a year, maybe [15 months], we’ll have over a million robo-taxis on the road,” he wrongly predicted back in 2019.

Following a sales decline last year that was particularly steep in Europe, Tesla is banking on its Cybercab two-seater to boost its fortunes. The company has started limited testing of automated vehicles as part of its Robotaxi pilot in Austin, Texas.

Last week, however, Tesla lost an appeal in a $243 million lawsuit verdict over a 2019 crash of a Model S — largely over its use of the terms “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving.” Last month, the company canceled Autopilot, its basic of advanced driver assistance tier, on new Model 3 and Model Y vehicles and switched its FSD (Supervised) tier to subscription-only.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Guide Labs debuts a new kind of interpretable LLM

    The challenge of wrangling a deep learning model is often understanding why it does what it does: Whether it’s xAI’s repeated struggle sessions to fine-tune Grok’s odd politics, ChatGPT’s struggles…

    The best massage guns in the UK to relieve sore, tired muscles | Fitness

    Massage guns are often pitched at the highly active. They can help you warm up for workouts, accelerate recovery and generally keep things loose and injury-free. However, you don’t have…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Biggest Tri-Cities Businesses in 2026

    Canada should celebrate when another nation wins at our game

    Canada should celebrate when another nation wins at our game

    Actor Robert Carradine, famous for ‘Lizzie McGuire’ and ‘Revenge of the Nerds,’ dies at 71

    Actor Robert Carradine, famous for ‘Lizzie McGuire’ and ‘Revenge of the Nerds,’ dies at 71

    Inside Health – Is the tide turning on ME research?

    Inside Health – Is the tide turning on ME research?

    Sanae Takaichi plans Japanese ‘Cfius’ to tighten economic security

    Sanae Takaichi plans Japanese ‘Cfius’ to tighten economic security

    Cuban ambassador to testify today as Ottawa promises aid is on the way

    Cuban ambassador to testify today as Ottawa promises aid is on the way