Mostly about geopolitics, plenty of fresh content.  And here is the transcript.  Excerpt:

Jon Finer:

Should the United States be willing to take military action to defend Taiwan? It’s a thorny question for politicians to answer, but we’d be interested in your view.

Tyler Cowen:

Well, this is what economists would call a mixed strategy. Ex-ante, we should have strategic ambiguity, and not just say, we’re not going to defend Taiwan. And when Joe Biden said, “Well, we are going to defend Taiwan,” I was quite happy.

Jon Finer:

Four times. Four times.

Tyler Cowen:

Four times, yes. I know there’s different versions of how it was talked back and the like, but it should be unclear. That said, when push comes to shove, if China has made its move, you have to look at what are the terms of the deal? What are they going to do with TSMC to our best knowledge? What’s the domestic quality chip production in the United States? How do we feel about Japan and maybe South Korea getting nuclear weapons? Can South Korea remain an autonomous nation? Those are a lot of balls to juggle and they’re all hard to judge at this moment. But I think ex-ante, we should definitely create some risk that we will go to war over Taiwan, but then make the best decision ex-post. But China knows that too, right? They’re not fools. They’ve studied game theory.

Jake Sullivan:

Tyler, I’m going to put you down as that being Tyler Cowen’s version of strategic ambiguity.

Tyler Cowen:

It may not be that different from your version.

Jake Sullivan:

Exactly.

Recommended, and I also talk about my secret, unpublished China book, still pending at Tsinghua, almost certainly forever.  And we cover UAPs and curling as well.