No one is happy with NASA’s new idea for private space stations



After speaking with a number of officials both in industry and the government, here’s an overview of what I believe is happening.

How we got here

NASA has never been good at transitions, be it from the end of Apollo to the space shuttle or the painful period from 2011 to 2020 when the shuttle stopped flying and the US space agency had to turn, hat in hand, to Russia to get its astronauts to the International Space Station.

As far back as 2018, then-NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine was sounding the alarm about the need to find a replacement for the space station if the United States wanted to maintain an ongoing human presence in low-Earth orbit. By December 2021, NASA had established support, generally at the level of a few hundred million dollars, for four different companies to work on developing private stations: Axiom Space, Blue Origin, Nanoracks (later became Voyager), and Northrop Grumman (which later withdrew).

Since then, each company has substantially modified its approach, and a new player, Vast Space, has entered the competition. All were waiting for clarity from NASA on what, exactly, it wanted. This would come as part of a “requirements” document that would kick off a second round of competition. It was generally expected that this second phase would winnow the competition to two private vendors. NASA intended to help the companies develop their stations with funding and expertise and then become one of several customers.

Since 2021, the companies have faced a series of difficulties, and from the outside, it was never clear that any were on track to have a viable, independent station by 2030, when NASA intended to deorbit the space station.

At the same time, the US space agency has dragged its feet on initiating the second phase of the competition. Then, last August, the acting director of NASA, Sean Duffy, issued a “directive” that brought significant revisions to the program. Almost immediately, though, it seemed like key elements of this directive might be walked back, leading to additional months of confusion.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Best 360 Cameras (2026): DJI, Insta360, GoPro

    Top 5 360 Cameras Compared Honorable Mentions Photograph: Scott Gilbertson Insta360 X4 for $340: I’d recommend skipping this one unless you can get it on sale for under $300. The…

    OpenAI shuts down Sora while Meta gets shut out in court

    When an 82-year-old Kentucky woman was offered $26 million from an AI company that wanted to build a data center on her land, she said no. Sure, that same company can try…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    A Downturn in Las Vegas Could Signal Tough Times for the Nation

    Back to the Future and Top Gun Actor James Tolkan Dead

    Back to the Future and Top Gun Actor James Tolkan Dead

    Cigarette Trousers Are Back In 2026—16 Chic Styles to Shop

    Cigarette Trousers Are Back In 2026—16 Chic Styles to Shop

    House Republicans reject Senate deal, prolonging partial government shutdown

    House Republicans reject Senate deal, prolonging partial government shutdown

    Dip-Buyers Arrive to Pull Gold Back From Brink of a Bear Market

    Best 360 Cameras (2026): DJI, Insta360, GoPro

    Best 360 Cameras (2026): DJI, Insta360, GoPro