Lawyers say access to ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ is still hard to get as a judge weighs the case


ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Attorneys for detainees at a state-run immigration detention facility in the Florida Everglades known as “Alligator Alcatraz” said Thursday that they are still facing hurdles in getting access to their clients, despite state claims that those barriers have been removed.

Two attorneys filed statements with a federal court in Fort Myers, Florida, saying their clients were unable to call them using staff cellphones, and the attorneys were unable to make unannounced visits to the facility.

A state contractor late last month testified that both options were available to detainees and attorneys during a hearing over whether detainees at the facility were getting adequate access to their lawyers. U.S. District Judge Sheri Polster Chappell has yet to rule on whether to grant the detainees’ request that they get the same access to their attorneys as detainees do at federally-run detention centers.

The Florida Department of Emergency Management, the state agency overseeing the detention center, didn’t respond to an e-mailed inquiry on Thursday. The Everglades facility was built last summer at a remote airstrip by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration to support President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. Florida also has built a second immigration detention center in north Florida.

The former Everglades detainees’ lawsuit claims that their First Amendment rights were violated. They say their attorneys have to make an appointment to visit three days in advance, unlike at other immigration detention facilities where lawyers can just show up during visiting hours; that detainees often are transferred to other facilities before their attorneys’ appointments to see them; and that scheduling delays have been so lengthy that detainees were unable to meet with attorneys before key deadlines.

State officials who are defendants in the lawsuit have denied restricting the detainees’ access to their attorneys and cited security and staffing reasons for any challenges. Federal officials who also are defendants denied that detainees’ First Amendment rights were violated.

___

Follow Mike Schneider on the social platform Bluesky: @mikeysid.bsky.social.

Mike Schneider, The Associated Press




Source link

  • Related Posts

    IRCC estimates over $100 million in temporary health care coverage savings

    PBO now projects interim federal health care spending to hit $1.5 billion by 2030. The Parliamentary Budget Office projects Ottawa will spend nearly $1 billion this year on health services…

    Came across a House of Commons petition to ban ICE…

    Anonymous asked: Came across a House of Commons petition to ban ICE from operating in Canada and to ban Canadian companies from working…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    IRCC estimates over $100 million in temporary health care coverage savings

    IRCC estimates over $100 million in temporary health care coverage savings

    Logistics stocks sink as AI fear trade finds latest victim

    Iranian students in Canada seeking support amid unrest back home

    Iranian students in Canada seeking support amid unrest back home

    EU reportedly opens another probe into Google’s ads pricing

    EU reportedly opens another probe into Google’s ads pricing

    Irishman held by ICE was issued warrant over 2009 drug offense in Ireland | ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement)

    Irishman held by ICE was issued warrant over 2009 drug offense in Ireland | ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement)

    This week on “Sunday Morning” (Feb. 15)

    This week on “Sunday Morning” (Feb. 15)