Factbox-Anthropic’s legal claims against Trump’s blanket government ban on AI startup


March 9 (Reuters) – Anthropic filed a lawsuit on Monday to block the Pentagon from placing it on a national security blacklist, escalating the artificial ‌intelligence lab’s high-stakes battle with the U.S. military over usage restrictions on its ‌technology.

The AI startup’s lawsuit against the U.S. government, President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, among ​others, makes the following claims:

FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION

The startup claimed that the Pentagon retaliated against Anthropic for protected activities in violation of the First Amendment, which ensures free speech rights.

Anthropic said in its lawsuit that the Constitution confers upon it “the right to express its views — ‌both publicly and to the ⁠government — about the limitations of its own AI services and important issues of AI safety.”

The lawsuit claims that the U.S. government’s blacklisting ⁠of the company constitutes retaliation against Anthropic’s expressive activities, including protected speech, viewpoints and petitioning of the government.

PRESIDENTIAL ACTION BEYOND LEGAL AUTHORITY

Anthropic claimed that President Donald Trump directing the U.S. government ​to ​stop work with Anthropic — announced in a post ​on his social media platform Truth ‌Social late last month — was “ultra vires,” or went beyond his legal power and authority.

FIFTH AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS

Anthropic alleges the U.S. government violated its Fifth Amendment rights to due process by effectively blacklisting the company without following required legal protocols.

According to the lawsuit, the government bypassed mandatory legal procedures by terminating contracts and blocking future work without providing prior ‌notice or a meaningful opportunity to respond.

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ​ACT VIOLATION

Anthropic alleged that the DOD designating the company ​as a supply-chain risk, and prohibiting ​the department’s contractors, suppliers and partners from conducting any commercial activity ‌with it, violates the Administrative Procedure ​Act.

The APA sets out ​procedures agencies must follow when making decisions and permits courts to override agency actions that are arbitrary, an abuse of discretion or otherwise unlawful.

Anthropic said Defense ​Secretary Pete Hegseth’s decision to ‌deem the company a supply-chain risk overstepped his authority, did not follow ​proper legal procedures and lacked supporting evidence.

(Reporting by Arsheeya Bajwa and Anhata ​Rooprai in Bengaluru; Editing by Alan Barona)



Source link

  • Related Posts

    S&P/TSX composite reverses course to end up over 100 points, U.S. stocks also gain

    TORONTO — Canada’s main stock index reversed course to finish in positive territory as the price of oil was up, but off the highs reached earlier in the day. The…

    Not just oil: Fertilizer prices spike amid Iran war, worrying Canadian farmers

    Christine McKee is alarmed by the skyrocketing cost of fertilizer that’s crucial to operating her southern Alberta farm. The average cost of urea — a widely-used type of fertilizer —…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Trump to hold news conference in Florida as Iran war rages

    Trump to hold news conference in Florida as Iran war rages

    Subscribe to read

    Subscribe to read

    Alberta separation talk already affecting more than a quarter of surveyed Calgary businesses

    Alberta separation talk already affecting more than a quarter of surveyed Calgary businesses

    Anthropic launches code review tool to check flood of AI-generated code

    Anthropic launches code review tool to check flood of AI-generated code

    American Airlines Passenger Ejected As Carriers Crack Down On Speakers

    American Airlines Passenger Ejected As Carriers Crack Down On Speakers

    Voting begins for New Democrats to choose their next leader « Canada’s NDP

    Voting begins for New Democrats to choose their next leader « Canada’s NDP