Could United Launch Alliance’s money problems finally force its owners to sell?



Pretty much every rocket company in the United States, save one, has embraced two fundamental tenets: reusability and diversification.

Most famously, SpaceX branched out from reusable rockets to pursue and dominate a growing spectrum of space services: cargo delivery, human spaceflight, satellite production, broadband, and, perhaps soon, orbital data centers and in-space manufacturing. Blue Origin is evolving from a pure rocket company into a satellite manufacturer, robotics developer, and, most recently, a potential competitor for SpaceX’s Starlink network.

Rocket Lab used a different approach to diversify after achieving success with its small Electron launch vehicle. The company relocated its headquarters from New Zealand to Southern California, started building spacecraft and payloads, and then went on a spree of corporate acquisitions to expand into satellite communications and take on a new role as a merchant supplier of satellite components and sensors. It’s now in a stage of advanced development of its partially reusable next-generation Neutron launch vehicle.

The list goes on. Firefly Aerospace started as a launch company and now builds Moon landers and space tugs. Relativity Space is already looking beyond rockets before ever putting anything into orbit.

They all realize an enduring truth in the space business. Launch is a low-margin business. SpaceX’s financial statements, now open to inspection after the company went public earlier this year, shine a light on this fact. Just 8 percent of the company’s $12.5 billion in revenue during the first half of this year came from launch services. Another 5 percent came from “launch and development” activities, which include SpaceX’s work on things like NASA’s lunar lander program.

SpaceX attributes the rest of its revenue to Starlink and AI. The potential of the latter is almost solely responsible for SpaceX’s post-IPO valuation of approximately $1.8 trillion.

Rocket Lab’s financials paint a similar picture. It reported $434 million in revenue for the first half of 2026 and credited a quarter of it to launch services.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Branch Ergonomic Chair Pro (Sega Edition) Review: Comfy, Not Boring

    There aren’t many differences between what you’d need for a good office chair versus a good gaming chair, but for some reason, they’re often marketed differently. And that’s usually what…

    Continue reading
    Today’s NYT Connections Hints and Answers for Sept. 12, #1189

    Looking for the most recent NYT Connections puzzle answers? CNET publishes daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands puzzles. In…

    Continue reading

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Watch: Ryanair Boeing 737 MAX Scrapes Wingtip, Aborts Dublin Landing In Crosswinds

    Watch: Ryanair Boeing 737 MAX Scrapes Wingtip, Aborts Dublin Landing In Crosswinds

    WATCH: Americans turn grief into good on 9/11

    WATCH:  Americans turn grief into good on 9/11

    Branch Ergonomic Chair Pro (Sega Edition) Review: Comfy, Not Boring

    Branch Ergonomic Chair Pro (Sega Edition) Review: Comfy, Not Boring

    Next tech era will be physical, and Canada is built for it

    Greg Schiano buyout, contract details as Rutgers football coach

    Greg Schiano buyout, contract details as Rutgers football coach

    What are we all playing this weekend?

    What are we all playing this weekend?