Scott Stinson: Ontario taxpayers plowing another $175 million into horse racing. When will it end?


A race at Woodbine Racetrack in Toronto. Going to the horse races was once the only way to attend a sporting event while putting some money on it, but now that can be done at any sporting event.

The Ontario government has recently finalized details of a $175-million boost to an industry that, such an investment suggests, it sees as a key driver of economic growth and jobs.

Artificial intelligence? Critical minerals?

Nope: horse racing.

The quaint pastime, for decades the only way to legally wager on sports in Ontario, has been struggling, now that it is very much not the only way to legally wager on sports in the province. Key metrics are down, and costs are up.

And so, the Doug Ford government has done what the Dalton McGuinty and Kathleen Wynne governments did before him: Handed over a giant sack of cash to the horse racing industry and tried to buy it some more time as it figures out how to stay relevant in a world where all that is needed to legally gamble on sports is an internet connection.

Ontario taxpayers are giving $35 million a year for the next five years, in addition to the up to $120-million annually that was already earmarked for the horse racing industry, to help it avoid collapse. The supplementary money has been in the works for months but was not formally approved until late June, after industry players agreed upon the distribution of the spoils.

It is a lot of money. That $35 million annual boost is more than the cost of one used Bombardier jet, the purchase of which sent the Ford government into a public-relations tailspin and caused the plane’s hasty resale. The cash injection also comes at a time when the province has cut post-secondary education grants, has chronic health-care funding problems, and is in negotiations with teachers unions over new contracts.

So how does horse racing, a niche industry if ever there was one, qualify for such an enthusiastic investment? The short answer is that it knows the right people. And it is very good at sounding the alarm.

Ontario’s financial backstopping of horse racing goes back to the late 1990s, when the introduction of legalized casino gambling in the Mike Harris era threw it into crisis. Threatened by flashy new competitors in the business of convincing the public to wager (and, more often than not, lose) money, the horse racing industry convinced the government of the day to share a portion of casino revenues with it.

Racetracks around the province, from smaller ones in places like Sarnia and the Kawarthas to the much larger one at Woodbine, promptly put slot machines on the premises and kept a slice of the proceeds. The Slots at Racetracks program was so successful that it was eventually pumping almost $350 million annually into the horse racing industry.

It was, in fact, too successful. The McGuinty government, facing a budget crunch in its waning days almost 15 years ago, abruptly cancelled the program, saying that the province could no longer afford to subsidize horse racing at such a scale. There was, not surprisingly, a political angle to the decision: most of Ontario’s 15 racetracks were in rural ridings that were not held by Liberals.

Faced with the potential collapse of the industry, which would have meant job losses and even the possible culling of thousands of horses, the Liberals backtracked, to a degree. A set proportion of slot machine money no longer went straight into horse racing, but there was transitional funding provided under a newly created Horse Improvement Program, which despite the name is not related to equine self-help.

That “transitional” money, more than $100 million annually at the time, has since become effectively permanent. The Ford government in 2019 signed off on a plan to direct more than $117 million each year to the horse racing industry, from OLG, the provincial lottery and gaming corporation, to Racing Ontario, an umbrella group.

That agreement has since been amended multiple times. The industry took a big hit during the stay-at-home days of the pandemic, then bounced back somewhat in the years since, but costs are said to have spiked due to inflation. Thus, the extra $175 million lifeline. That agreement says the government expects that the horse racing industry will have increased responsibility “to become self-governing and manage its business towards greater sustainability” — which is a polite way of saying it doesn’t want to hand over another giant pile of cash in five years.

But, how is that going? The financials for the industry, published by OLG, are a sea of red. At this time last year, the amount wagered on live racing was down almost 12 per cent from the year prior, and the number of tickets sold at tracks was off by more than 16 per cent. That only continued a trend, with wagers down more than five per cent and tickets sold down more than 22 per cent a year earlier. And that comes after the provincial auditor general found in a 2019 report that Ontario wagering on horse racing had dropped by 44 per cent since 2009. That report also said more than half the industry’s revenue was generated by government sources.

None of that should be surprising. If legalized casino gambling was once an existential threat to Ontario horse racing, then legal sports betting was an apocalypse. Where going to the ponies was once the only way to attend a sporting event while putting some money on it, now that can be done at any sporting event. Alternatively, an Ontario resident can bet on just about anything, at any time, using online platforms.

The industry’s defence of its subsidies, which is also the government’s justification for them, is that it supports more than 15,000 jobs and generates close to $2 billion in economic activity. And a lot of those jobs — trainers, breeders, groomers, farmers — are in rural areas where they would not be easily replaced if the racing industry shrank drastically.

But the whole idea of the government’s backstopping of the industry, for more than a decade now, was to provide a platform where it could become sustainable on its merits. The taxpayer supports were supposed to decrease over time, and instead they have gone in the other direction. Throwing more money at a problem and hoping it goes away isn’t what a government that insists it is concerned about wasteful spending would do.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    LeBlanc meets with U.S. trade rep in Washington as tariff deadline nears

    Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc is set to meet with United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer Thursday as U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest tariff deadline approaches. Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic…

    If Trump imposes 50 per cent tariffs, should Canada hit back? Trade analysts disagree

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Canada’s trade negotiators are racing to avert 50 per cent tariffs on hundreds of Canadian exports, imposed under the never-before-used Section 338 of the Tariff Act of…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Confirmed: Delta Air Lines To Link Austin & Paris With Nonstop Flights Launching In 2027

    Confirmed: Delta Air Lines To Link Austin & Paris With Nonstop Flights Launching In 2027

    Amiga strategy classic Defender of the Crown is back with both old and fresh graphics, and an all new roguelite mode

    Amiga strategy classic Defender of the Crown is back with both old and fresh graphics, and an all new roguelite mode

    MLB Power Rankings Week 20: Brewers pass Dodgers for No. 1

    MLB Power Rankings Week 20: Brewers pass Dodgers for No. 1

    Meta says it has axed 750,000 Australian youth accounts

    Trump’s Immigration Policy Echoes 1920s Turn Against Certain Newcomers

    Trump’s Immigration Policy Echoes 1920s Turn Against Certain Newcomers

    Families concerned about reports of mental health crisis on USS Lincoln

    Families concerned about reports of mental health crisis on USS Lincoln