I am not ready to make this claim, but I wondered this after seeing the marvelous exhibit at Fondation Vuitton.  To Calder’s credit:

1. His work is both beautiful and deep.  It also can be fun.  Unlike many other high-status artists, most Americans like or could like his work.

2. It is immediately recognizable and the body of work has a coherence as a whole.

3. He invented a new form — the mobile — and showed it could be art.

4. His works have iconic placement in many major American cities, namely Chicago, Grand Rapids, New York, Los Angeles, Cambridge, Philadelphia, Houston, Minneapolis, Seattle, and a bunch more.  Who else can match that list?

5. He worked in multiple genres with great success, including not just sculpture (of various kinds, including wire sculpture and bronze sculpture) but also painting, works on paper, and jewelry (!).  He worked with metal and wood and wire and string in his sculptures.  The exhibit is wonderful in showing all this.

6. He built things, a very American endeavor, and he trained as a mechanical engineer.  Mobility is also a very American idea.

7. He lived during the major period of American growth and hegemony, namely 1898-1976, very American years to have been on the scene.

I would note that most people think first of his large installations, which to me are his least interesting works.  The small sculptures I admire the most?  In this regard he remains underrated.

Who else are possible candidates for this designation?  A while back Jasper Johns might have been an obvious leader for the title, and he remains in contention.  But perhaps it is all a tad too formal and serious?

Rothko and Pollock are too one-dimensional, no matter how much you may admire the dimension.  The Hudson River School does not boil down easily enough to a single artist, plus it is mainly just painting.  Winslow Homer is a possibility.  Warhol is another candidate, as his work is both seminal and “very American,” but currently it feels overexposed?  (I am not anti-Warhol but perhaps his influence peaked some while ago.)  Roy Lichtenstein did very well in sculpture as well as painting and prints, and he is in the running as well.

But I no longer think Calder is such a crazy choice for this designation.  Do go see the show!  The people we saw the show with were amazed at how much they had underrated his depth, breadth, and quality.