Feds extend amnesty period for firearms ban pending Supreme Court ruling


Text to Speech Icon

Listen to this article

Estimated 4 minutes

The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.

The Liberal government is extending the amnesty period for gun owners to comply with its “assault-style” firearm ban pending a Supreme Court ruling on the policy.

The deadline had previously been extended multiple times since the ban was announced in 2020, with the latest date to comply set for October.

The government said in a news release on Tuesday afternoon that the amnesty period will now end within 90 days of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

“By extending the amnesty period, the government is providing certainty to individual owners and businesses that they will continue to be protected from criminal liability while the Supreme Court hears the appeal and renders its decision,” the release said.

The top court agreed in March to hear arguments against the Liberal government’s controversial decision to outlaw what it dubs “assault-style” firearms.

The ban makes it illegal to own hundreds of makes and models, including the AR-15 and Ruger Mini-14.

The original 2020 ban was challenged by firearm owners and the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR) — the country’s gun lobby — who argued the government lacked the authority to ban the guns via an order issued by the federal cabinet. They point to the Criminal Code which restricts cabinet from prohibiting firearms “if they are deemed reasonable for hunting or sporting purposes.”

A court building is seen in the foggy distance.
The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of the gun ban next year. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Their cases were dismissed by the Federal Court in 2023, with Justice Catherine Kane saying then prime minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet did not exceed their powers in passing the regulations.

The Federal Court of Appeal agreed with her decision in 2025, with the chief justice writing that “surely, the inherent danger that some firearms pose to public safety” and “the increasing demand for measures to address gun violence” are valid considerations “in determining whether their use is reasonable for hunting and sporting purposes.”

The CCFR said it “welcomes the news” of the amnesty extension.

“We suspect that the government realized that a defeat at the Supreme Court of Canada after collecting guns and or prosecuting those in non-compliance would be an untenable position,” the group said in an emailed statement.

“We look forward to presenting our case to Canada’s Supreme Court and achieving justice for law-abiding property owners and businesses.”

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of the ban next year.

While first introduced under Trudeau, Prime Minister Mark Carney promised to follow through with the firearm ban and compensation program.

WATCH | Program misses target by nearly half:

Gun buyback program misses target by nearly half

The federal government says it bought back 67,000 banned assault-style weapons by the declaration deadline, which is about half of what the government had expected.

Even though the amnesty period is being extended, the government says the compensation and collection portion of the buyback program is still underway.

The declaration period for the buyback program for businesses ended last week, while the deadline for individuals to declare their firearms ended in March.

The government initially expected to collect 136,000 guns from individual owners, but only received declarations for about half that amount.

“While collection and compensation for individuals are underway, I would encourage firearm owners to book their appointments as soon as they get their notification. It is their only chance to get compensation for their prohibited firearms,” Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree said in Tuesday’s news release.

PolySeSouvient, the country’s most vocal gun control advocacy group, said the extension is “disappointing.”

“Highly lethal, prohibited weapons will remain in private hands for many more months,” the group said in a news release.

“Legislation should not be suspended simply because it is challenged.”



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Victim impact statements heard in B.C. woman’s human trafficking trial – BC

    WARNING: Some of the details in this story are disturbing. Discretion is advised. Victim impact statements were read on Tuesday in the sentencing hearing for Jennifer Stephens. She is charged…

    Trump-backed Pamela Evette and Alan Wilson head to runoff in South Carolina GOP governor race | South Carolina

    Donald Trump-backed Pamela Evette, South Carolina’s lieutenant governor, and Alan Wilson, the state’s attorney general, have advanced to a runoff in a competitive race to represent the Republican party in…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    WATCH: The historic 2026 NBA Finals and what comes next

    WATCH:  The historic 2026 NBA Finals and what comes next

    Anthropic Offers Mythos Upgrade for Cyber Partners and a ‘Safe’ Version for the Rest of You

    Anthropic Offers Mythos Upgrade for Cyber Partners and a ‘Safe’ Version for the Rest of You

    Mai Vang advances to November ballot for California US House seat, will face fellow Democrat Matsui

    Mai Vang advances to November ballot for California US House seat, will face fellow Democrat Matsui

    City of Vancouver’ cost to host FIFA World Cup 2026 at $338M

    City of Vancouver’ cost to host FIFA World Cup 2026 at $338M

    Victim impact statements heard in B.C. woman’s human trafficking trial – BC

    Victim impact statements heard in B.C. woman’s human trafficking trial – BC

    Sleep apnea’s hidden heart disease trigger found in the gut

    Sleep apnea’s hidden heart disease trigger found in the gut