Court gives Mahmoud Khalil more time to fight Trump administration’s efforts to deport him


A federal appeals court is giving former Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil more time to fight the Trump administration’s efforts to deport him.

Khalil, a lawful permanent resident of the U.S., was detained by immigration authorities last year because of his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations at Columbia in the spring of 2024.

The U.S. government argued at the time that Khalil’s presence in the U.S. was harmful to the country’s foreign policy interests.

Khalil spent months in detention before a federal judge in New Jersey freed him, saying that the government had acted unconstitutionally.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals then heard the case. It ruled that the judge in New Jersey didn’t have the authority to intervene in Khalil’s case, and said the case needed to proceed first through the immigration courts.

The appeals court on Tuesday, however, said it would put its ruling on hold while Khalil appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union, which is involved in representing Khalil, said they’re grateful for the decision.

“We look forward to asking the Supreme Court to make clear that the government cannot use the threat of detention and deportation to silence dissent,” he said in a statement.

An appeal to the high court is expected in the coming months, possibly in late summer.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security did not immediately comment on the decision.

As the court directed, Khalil’s lawyers have also argued his case in the immigration courts — so far unsuccessfully. He now has a separate appeal of those proceedings pending before a different federal appeals court, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in Louisiana.

Tuesday’s stay by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals provides Khalil with an extra layer of insulation against his possible re-arrest and deportation while his other appeals are still pending.

The court did not provide a reason for the decision, but said, “If no timely petition is filed,” parties need to let the court know in writing.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Evacuation Orders Lifted as Southern California Chemical Tank Cools

    Southern California officials lifted a sweeping evacuation order in Orange County late Tuesday after firefighters announced they had stabilized a damaged chemical tank that had posed a risk of a…

    Biden sues DOJ to block release of audio recordings tied to special counsel probe

    Former President Joe Biden filed suit against the Justice Department on Tuesday in an effort to block the release of recordings and transcripts from interviews he gave for his memoir…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Canada to buy surveillance planes from Swedish company Saab

    Canada to buy surveillance planes from Swedish company Saab

    Minneapolis police chief Brian O’Hara resigns after allegedly interfering with investigation into his conduct

    Minneapolis police chief Brian O’Hara resigns after allegedly interfering with investigation into his conduct

    RedMagic 11S Pro Shows Off Liquid Cooling on Every Model, but With a Price Bump

    RedMagic 11S Pro Shows Off Liquid Cooling on Every Model, but With a Price Bump

    Dragon Quest 40th anniversary: All news and game reveals

    Dragon Quest 40th anniversary: All news and game reveals

    Cargo Airlines Desperately Need New Jets

    Cargo Airlines Desperately Need New Jets

    The Best Baseball-Hat Outfits, According to Celebrities

    The Best Baseball-Hat Outfits, According to Celebrities