Supreme Court sides with Trump in immigration judges’ speech restrictions dispute


WASHINGTON — WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with President Donald Trump’s administration in a lawsuit over speech restrictions for immigration judges that touched on the rights of federal workers.

The justices overturned a lower-court ruling that had allowed the case to proceed and raised questions about whether a complaint system for federal employees is still working as intended after the Republican president fired some of its top officials.

Immigration judges are federal employees, unlike those in federal courtrooms. They want to sue over a policy restricting their public speeches that started in Trump’s first term in office and continued under President Joe Biden’s Democratic administration. The judges argue it is a free speech issue that belongs in federal court.

The Trump administration disagreed, saying the judges must instead take their dispute to the complaint system for federal employees overseen by the Merit Systems Protection Board.

The court ruled on procedural grounds, but Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, wrote to rebuke the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for responding to “political controversies of the day.”

Tuesday’s decision comes as the court weighs another lawsuit about Trump’s power to fire heads of independent agencies. The outcome is also expected to affect firing power over Merit Systems Protection Board members.

The judges first sued in 2020, and the Supreme Court previously temporarily sided with them on an emergency basis in December 2025. A union said in a statement that the judges were disappointed by the decision, but the case is “far from over.”

“Justice cannot endure when judges are intimidated into silence, nor can a nation remain free when the rule of law is subordinate to the whims of political ambition,” the National Association of Immigration Judges said.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche applauded the decision, saying it “sends a clear message: lower courts must accept that the law is the law, no matter the ‘political controversies of the day,’” he wrote in a social-media post.

___

Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Manny Fernandez, Bulwark of Dolphins’ Defense, Dies at 79

    Manny Fernandez, the brawny, tenacious anchor of the Miami Dolphins’ “No Name Defense,” which helped carry the team to an undefeated season in 1972 that culminated in a victory in…

    Fatalities confirmed after chemical tank ruptures at pulp and paper mill in Washington state

    A chemical tank ruptured at a facility in Washington state, resulting in multiple critical injuries and an unknown number of fatalities, authorities said. The “hazardous materials incident” was reported Tuesday…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Why Doesn’t The Airbus A321 Board From Mid-Cabin Like The Boeing 757?

    Why Doesn’t The Airbus A321 Board From Mid-Cabin Like The Boeing 757?

    Minister files judicial review of First Nations…

    Dual tower proposal for Vancouver aims to go higher, reduce social housing units

    Dual tower proposal for Vancouver aims to go higher, reduce social housing units

    Residential school survivors testify in front of international tribunal

    Residential school survivors testify in front of international tribunal

    Days of Play 2026 begins May 27 – PlayStation.Blog

    Days of Play 2026 begins May 27 – PlayStation.Blog

    The inefficient pricing of news