Bipartisan House bill would ban use of federal money for DOJ’s “anti-weaponization” fund



Washington — Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi of New York introduced a bill Thursday to ban the use of federal money for paying out claims from the Justice Department’s new “anti-weaponization” fund.

The bill, titled the Bipartisan Transparency for American Taxpayers Act, comes as Republicans fight over the nearly $1.8 billion fund that was established to compensate people who claim they were improperly targeted or investigated by the government. Allies and supporters of the president, including some of those involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, have said they plan to submit claims for payouts.

The fund was created as part of a settlement of a suit by President Trump against the IRS over a leak of his tax returns, a highly unusual arrangement that has elicited strong criticism from Democrats and a growing number of Republicans on Capitol Hill. 

Fitzpatrick and Suozzi’s two-page bill says “no federal funds … may be used for the payment of any claim submitted to the Anti-Weaponization Fund, established by the Department of Justice on May 18, 2026.” 

“Congress has a constitutional responsibility to protect taxpayer dollars and oversee federal spending,” Fitzpatrick said in a statement. “Taxpayer dollars will not become a discretionary payout fund. Transparency is not optional. Accountability is not negotiable.”

Moderate Republican Revolt To Force January Obamacare Vote

File photo: Reps. Tom Suozzi, a Democrat from New York, left, and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican from Pennsylvania, at the U.S. Capitol.

Kent Nishimura / Bloomberg via Getty Images


Suozzi said the “slush fund” would set a “dangerous precedent.” 

In a letter to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche on Wednesday, Fitzpatrick expressed “urgent concern” about the fund, which was established “with no oversight or approval from Congress.” He asked that Blanche respond to him by June 1 about where the money is coming from, who would be eligible to receive it and under what authority the fund was created. 

On Thursday, opposition to the DOJ fund derailed hopes for passage of Republicans’ reconciliation package to provide money for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol for three years, which GOP leaders were hoping to get through both chambers by the end of the week to meet Mr. Trump’s June 1 deadline. 



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Britney Spears argued with police, denied being intoxicated during March DUI arrest, bodycam footage shows

    Pop star Britney Spears was driving erratically and speeding when she was pulled over and arrested for driving under the influence in California in March, according to police records. An…

    Charges Dismissed for Ex-Assistant Principal After Shooting by 6-Year-Old

    A judge dismissed charges on Thursday against a former assistant principal in Virginia who was accused of failing to act before a 6-year-old child who had brought a gun to…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    ANALYSIS: Start of NHL final four playoffs provides the unexpected – Winnipeg

    ANALYSIS: Start of NHL final four playoffs provides the unexpected – Winnipeg

    The Download: coding’s future, the ‘Steroid Olympics,’ and AI-driven science

    The Download: coding’s future, the ‘Steroid Olympics,’ and AI-driven science

    In Berlin, Cars Are a Culture War Flashpoint

    In Berlin, Cars Are a Culture War Flashpoint

    The Latest: Trump heads to a competitive New York district as voters sour on the economy

    The Latest: Trump heads to a competitive New York district as voters sour on the economy

    A Reno Biotech Just Rang the Nasdaq Bell — Here’s Why the Whole Regenerative-Medicine Tape Is Worth Watching

    Persephone boat from The Beachcombers restored after heavy damage

    Persephone boat from The Beachcombers restored after heavy damage