Justice Department investigating the NFL over subscription fee concerns, source says


WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has opened an investigation into whether the NFL is forcing football fans to pay too much in subscription fees, according to a person familiar with the investigation.

In years past, football fans watched NFL games over broadcast TV, delivered free into their homes. The 1961 Sports Broadcasting Act allowed for sports leagues to get around some antitrust concerns and negotiate media rights. But now, games are spread across many different platforms and channels, and some require paid subscriptions to access.

The Justice Department investigation is into antitrust and anticompetitive tactics, the person said. It comes after Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, the chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, wrote a letter last month requesting a review of the NFL’s streaming platform exemptions and wanted to know whether the streaming package fees violated the Sports Broadcasting act.

The Justice Department didn’t comment. The White House referred questions back to the Justice Department. The NFL didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. The Wall Street Journal first reported the investigation.

“To watch every NFL game during the past season, football fans spent almost $1,000 on cable and streaming subscriptions,” Lee wrote in his letter.

The NFL said in a statement in February, according to The Associated Press, that 87% of its games are shown on free broadcast television, in addition to digital platforms.

“The NFL has the most accessible, fan-friendly distribution model across all of sports and entertainment,” according to the statement.

Following Lee’s letter, the Federal Communications Commission said it was seeking public responses about how viewing habits have changed across the modern landscape that depends increasingly on streaming services.

“The packaging of individual teams’ television rights was thought to be necessary to enhance the financial stability of the leagues by assuring equal distribution of revenues among all teams,” according to the FCC letter.

Commissioners wanted to know whether the current marketplace benefits or harms consumers, and the fragmented media landscape facilitates or restricts the ability of traditional media to broadcast work in the public interest, including in local news and reporting.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Why are Canadian bond yields surging?

    Earl Davis, head of Fixed Income and Money Markets at BMO Global Asset Management, talks about why Canadian bond yields are surging. Read More Source link

    New Emergent Ventures tranche on science policy and communication

    American science policy is now more important than at perhaps any previous point in history—how science is organized and funded (or not funded) in this country continues to rise in…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Why are Canadian bond yields surging?

    Saskatoon house fire death deemed a homicide, police say – Saskatoon

    Saskatoon house fire death deemed a homicide, police say – Saskatoon

    ‘The danger and value of water are in my blood’: how rain fences are making Dutch homes more climate resilient | Flooding

    ‘The danger and value of water are in my blood’: how rain fences are making Dutch homes more climate resilient | Flooding

    A raw portrait of fame, family and fighting spirit

    Submit your questions to Alphaville: will Trump blow up the financial dominance of the US?

    New Emergent Ventures tranche on science policy and communication

    New Emergent Ventures tranche on science policy and communication