No one is happy with NASA’s new idea for private space stations



After speaking with a number of officials both in industry and the government, here’s an overview of what I believe is happening.

How we got here

NASA has never been good at transitions, be it from the end of Apollo to the space shuttle or the painful period from 2011 to 2020 when the shuttle stopped flying and the US space agency had to turn, hat in hand, to Russia to get its astronauts to the International Space Station.

As far back as 2018, then-NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine was sounding the alarm about the need to find a replacement for the space station if the United States wanted to maintain an ongoing human presence in low-Earth orbit. By December 2021, NASA had established support, generally at the level of a few hundred million dollars, for four different companies to work on developing private stations: Axiom Space, Blue Origin, Nanoracks (later became Voyager), and Northrop Grumman (which later withdrew).

Since then, each company has substantially modified its approach, and a new player, Vast Space, has entered the competition. All were waiting for clarity from NASA on what, exactly, it wanted. This would come as part of a “requirements” document that would kick off a second round of competition. It was generally expected that this second phase would winnow the competition to two private vendors. NASA intended to help the companies develop their stations with funding and expertise and then become one of several customers.

Since 2021, the companies have faced a series of difficulties, and from the outside, it was never clear that any were on track to have a viable, independent station by 2030, when NASA intended to deorbit the space station.

At the same time, the US space agency has dragged its feet on initiating the second phase of the competition. Then, last August, the acting director of NASA, Sean Duffy, issued a “directive” that brought significant revisions to the program. Almost immediately, though, it seemed like key elements of this directive might be walked back, leading to additional months of confusion.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Oppo made the best foldable phone, again

    There are always a few reasons people give for not buying a foldable phone. Some — price, battery life, camera quality — are mostly a matter of manufacturers balancing spec…

    Senators want US energy information agency to monitor data center electricity usage

    Utilities are privy to information about energy use from data centers in their region; they use that information to forecast growth. But data centers will often shop around to different…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    The RCMP, the spy and the betrayal of national chief George Manuel

    The RCMP, the spy and the betrayal of national chief George Manuel

    On CPAC’s Main Stage, Fissures in the Party Trump Remade

    Oppo made the best foldable phone, again

    Oppo made the best foldable phone, again

    Rahul Chahar returns to Surrey for eight-game County Championship stint

    Rahul Chahar returns to Surrey for eight-game County Championship stint

    Lawn Mowing Simulator 2 takes to Kickstarter with the lushest virtual grass I’ve ever seen

    Lawn Mowing Simulator 2 takes to Kickstarter with the lushest virtual grass I’ve ever seen

    Nighttime strikes kill at least 5 in Ukraine, as Zelenskyy discusses drone defense on UAE visit

    Nighttime strikes kill at least 5 in Ukraine, as Zelenskyy discusses drone defense on UAE visit