Factbox-Anthropic’s legal claims against Trump’s blanket government ban on AI startup


March 9 (Reuters) – Anthropic filed a lawsuit on Monday to block the Pentagon from placing it on a national security blacklist, escalating the artificial ‌intelligence lab’s high-stakes battle with the U.S. military over usage restrictions on its ‌technology.

The AI startup’s lawsuit against the U.S. government, President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, among ​others, makes the following claims:

FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION

The startup claimed that the Pentagon retaliated against Anthropic for protected activities in violation of the First Amendment, which ensures free speech rights.

Anthropic said in its lawsuit that the Constitution confers upon it “the right to express its views — ‌both publicly and to the ⁠government — about the limitations of its own AI services and important issues of AI safety.”

The lawsuit claims that the U.S. government’s blacklisting ⁠of the company constitutes retaliation against Anthropic’s expressive activities, including protected speech, viewpoints and petitioning of the government.

PRESIDENTIAL ACTION BEYOND LEGAL AUTHORITY

Anthropic claimed that President Donald Trump directing the U.S. government ​to ​stop work with Anthropic — announced in a post ​on his social media platform Truth ‌Social late last month — was “ultra vires,” or went beyond his legal power and authority.

FIFTH AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS

Anthropic alleges the U.S. government violated its Fifth Amendment rights to due process by effectively blacklisting the company without following required legal protocols.

According to the lawsuit, the government bypassed mandatory legal procedures by terminating contracts and blocking future work without providing prior ‌notice or a meaningful opportunity to respond.

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ​ACT VIOLATION

Anthropic alleged that the DOD designating the company ​as a supply-chain risk, and prohibiting ​the department’s contractors, suppliers and partners from conducting any commercial activity ‌with it, violates the Administrative Procedure ​Act.

The APA sets out ​procedures agencies must follow when making decisions and permits courts to override agency actions that are arbitrary, an abuse of discretion or otherwise unlawful.

Anthropic said Defense ​Secretary Pete Hegseth’s decision to ‌deem the company a supply-chain risk overstepped his authority, did not follow ​proper legal procedures and lacked supporting evidence.

(Reporting by Arsheeya Bajwa and Anhata ​Rooprai in Bengaluru; Editing by Alan Barona)



Source link

  • Related Posts

    NRC to acquire Bombardier jet as feds earmark nearly $1B for defence research

    OTTAWA — The federal government says it will put more than $900 million into the National Research Council for defence initiatives, including the purchase of a Bombardier jet for private…

    Trump delivers remarks in Doral, Florida

    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. UP NEXT Explosive incident near NYC mayor’s home ‘inspired by ISIS,’ officials say 05:21 Explosives…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    The SAFE Act is an Imperfect Vehicle for Real Section 702 Reform

    The SAFE Act is an Imperfect Vehicle for Real Section 702 Reform

    Two charged with throwing bombs at NYC protest cited ISIS, complaint says

    Two charged with throwing bombs at NYC protest cited ISIS, complaint says

    Second Life Podcast: Kahlana Barfield Brown

    Second Life Podcast: Kahlana Barfield Brown

    Former Missouri House speaker sentenced to prison for COVID relief fraud

    Former Missouri House speaker sentenced to prison for COVID relief fraud

    NRC to acquire Bombardier jet as feds earmark nearly $1B for defence research

    NRC to acquire Bombardier jet as feds earmark nearly $1B for defence research

    How polar geopolitics are creeping into the Arctic Winter Games

    How polar geopolitics are creeping into the Arctic Winter Games