EFF’s Policy on LLM-Assisted Contributions to Our Open-Source Projects



We recently introduced a policy governing large language model (LLM) assisted contributions to EFF’s open-source projects. At EFF, we strive to produce high quality software tools, rather than simply generating more lines of code in less time. We now explicitly require that contributors understand the code they submit to us and that comments and documentation be authored by a human.

LLMs excel at producing code that looks mostly human generated, but can often have underlying bugs that can be replicated at scale. This makes LLM-generated code exhausting to review, especially with smaller, less resourced teams. LLMs make it easy for well-intentioned people to submit code that may suffer from hallucination, omission, exaggeration, or misrepresentation.

It is with this in mind that we introduce a new policy on submitting LLM-assisted contributions to our open-source projects. We want to ensure that our maintainers spend their time reviewing well thought out submissions. We do not completely outright ban LLMs, as their use has become so pervasive a blanket ban is impractical to enforce.

Banning a tool is against our general ethos, but this class of tools comes with an ecosystem of problems. This includes issues with code reviews turning into code refactors for our maintainers if the contributor doesn’t understand the code they submitted. Or the sheer scale of contributions that could come in as AI generated code but is only marginally useful or potentially unreviewable. By disclosing when you use LLM tools, you help us spend our time wisely.

EFF has described how extending copyright is an impractical solution to the problem of AI generated content, but it is worth mentioning that these tools raise privacy, censorship, ethical, and climatic concerns for many. These issues are largely a continuation of tech companies’ harmful practices that led us to this point. LLM generated code isn’t written on a clean slate, but born out of a climate of companies speedrunning their profits over people. We are once again in “just trust us” territory of Big Tech being obtuse about the power it wields. We are strong  advocates of using tools to innovate and come up with new ideas. However, we ask you to come to our projects knowing how to use them safely.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Diablo II’s new Warlock is a great excuse to revisit a classic game

    Of the Warlock’s three Demonic partner options, I found myself leaning most on the Tainted, which can stay out of harm’s way while harassing slower enemies from afar with fireballs.…

    Jeffrey Epstein’s Ties to CBP Agents Sparked a DOJ Probe

    United States prosecutors and federal law enforcement spent over a year examining ties between Jeffrey Epstein and Customs and Border Protection officers stationed in the US Virgin Islands (USVI), according…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Eric Dane remembered by friends, costars after his death at 53

    Eric Dane remembered by friends, costars after his death at 53

    Southwest Airlines Staying “Optimistic” For Boeing 737 MAX 7 Debut In Early 2027

    Southwest Airlines Staying “Optimistic” For Boeing 737 MAX 7 Debut In Early 2027

    North Korea’s Kim Jong Un launches key party congress held every 5 years | Kim Jong Un News

    North Korea’s Kim Jong Un launches key party congress held every 5 years | Kim Jong Un News

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest prompts calls for justice in the US | Jeffrey Epstein

    Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest prompts calls for justice in the US | Jeffrey Epstein

    Diablo II’s new Warlock is a great excuse to revisit a classic game

    Diablo II’s new Warlock is a great excuse to revisit a classic game

    Navy Is the Color Trend Set to Take Over—Here Are the Best Pieces to Shop

    Navy Is the Color Trend Set to Take Over—Here Are the Best Pieces to Shop