Musk seeks up to $134 billion from OpenAI, Microsoft in ‘wrongful gains’


By Bipasha Dey

Jan 17 (Reuters) – Elon Musk is seeking up to $134 billion from OpenAI and Microsoft, arguing he deserves the “wrongful gains” that they received ​from his early support of the artificial-intelligence startup, according to a ‌court filing on Friday.

OpenAI gained between $65.5 billion and $109.4 billion from the billionaire entrepreneur’s contributions when he was ‌co-founding OpenAI from 2015, while Microsoft gained between $13.3 billion and $25.1 billion, Musk said in the federal court filing ahead of his trial against the two companies.

OpenAI, Microsoft and Musk’s lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comments outside business hours. ⁠OpenAI has called the lawsuit “baseless” ‌and part of a “harassment” campaign by Musk. A Microsoft lawyer has said there is no evidence that the company “aided and abetted” ‍OpenAI.

Musk, who left OpenAI in 2018 and now runs xAI with its competitor chatbot Grok, alleges that ChatGPT operator OpenAI violated its founding mission in a high-profile restructuring to a ​for-profit entity.

A judge in Oakland, California, ruled this month that a jury ‌will hear the trial, expected to start in April.

Musk’s filing says he contributed about $38 million, 60% of OpenAI’s early seed funding, helped recruit staff, connect the founders with key contacts and lend credibility to the project when it was created.

“Just as an early investor in a startup company may realize gains many orders of ⁠magnitude greater than the investor’s initial investment, ​the wrongful gains that OpenAI and Microsoft have ​earned – and which Mr. Musk is now entitled to disgorge – are much larger than Mr. Musk’s initial contributions,” Musk argues.

The filing says ‍Musk’s contributions to OpenAI ⁠and Microsoft were calculated by his expert witness, financial economist C. Paul Wazzan.

Musk may seek punitive damages and other penalties, including a possible injunction, ⁠if the jury finds either company liable, the filing says, without specifying what form any injunction ‌might take.

(Reporting by Bipasha Dey in Bengaluru; Additional reporting by Mike ‌Scarcella in Washington; Editing by William Mallard)



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Kirk LaPointe: Why killing B.C.'s Small Business Roundtable was a mistake

    The quiet elimination of the Small Business Roundtable reveals a government uncomfortable with unfiltered economic advice Source link

    Meet the Macuga sisters, who became Olympic-class athletes by accident

    “I would absolutely lose it if any of them was doing moguls,” Alli said. “I don’t think I could handle that. I would get so pissed if they were beating…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    A routine eye treatment is raising new concerns for glaucoma patients

    A routine eye treatment is raising new concerns for glaucoma patients

    Ted Sarandos says Netflix will commit to 45-day theatrical releases

    Ted Sarandos says Netflix will commit to 45-day theatrical releases

    Durban’s Super Giants v Paarl Royals – Cricket

    Durban’s Super Giants v Paarl Royals – Cricket

    Kirk LaPointe: Why killing B.C.'s Small Business Roundtable was a mistake

    Kirk LaPointe: Why killing B.C.'s Small Business Roundtable was a mistake

    Dick hopes to improve shooting with better defence

    Dick hopes to improve shooting with better defence

    WATCH: Trump unveils long-awaited health care plan

    WATCH:  Trump unveils long-awaited health care plan